pac and roach not impressed with MAB's offer.

[Bogler]

****, u just blatantly implied mab is a tune up ... i mean, pac is one bad dude, but brodeL, c'mon

yeah, mab is not a tuneup fight and pac shouldn't take him lightly. yeah he ****d him in their last fight, but mab must have something up his sleeve now to call out pac after 2 years. i believe pac can repeat, but i just don't want him to step into that ring very overconfident.

[Alibata]

yeah, mab is not a tuneup fight and pac shouldn't take him lightly. yeah he ****d him in their last fight, but mab must have something up his sleeve now to call out pac after 2 years. i believe pac can repeat, but i just don't want him to step into that ring very overconfident.

Agreed, Mab is a smart fighter and should be able to adjust. Having seen JMM and Morales handle Pac, it should be a much more competative fight. I think Pac has a better chin now and more power but lost some of his speed too since the first encounter and it was the speed Mab had fits with.

[DIEGO DA HITMAN]

I don't think Morales has enough left in the tank, after his last two sub-par efforts, but I can't blame Pacquiao for wanting a rubber match. If he beats "El Terrible" again, he'd be 2-1 against him, and have a win against Barrera, and would lay claim to the "King of the Super Featherweights" for this era. If Manny's camp is not impressed with the offer, Barrera is probably seeking the lion's share. If that's the case, then MAB obviously doesn't want any more of Pacman. The first bout was such a rout for Pacquiao, that I honestly don't see Barrera winning. Manny's improved since then, and Barrera hasn't shown significant improvement, IMO. While Pacquiao's fought Morales twice, Barrera's fought fringe contenders like Fana and Peden. They are both huge names, and a 50-50 split would be fair in my eyes. However, if one guy deserves the lion's share, it's Pacquiao, without a doubt. If Barrera is beaten as badly in the rematch as he was in the previos bout, his stock will surely plummet, hurting his chances at a Lightweight title. Fortunately, he has created a big enough legacy for himself that he will always be a draw, and win or lose, could probably still line up a title fight. If he's beaten thoroughly again, he may never be good enough to beat a Lightweight champion, though. I hope this fight happens, but I don't think it will be a good move in the long run for MAB, money aside.

[morancito]

Nah! Just look at your past arguments and how it blunders bad on you.

Now you're not making any sense. It would be in your best interest to practice your Grammar a little (or a lot, preferably), if you don't want to sound like the uneducated piece of **** you actually are.

This lesson is for free. Your sentence should have read:

"Just look at your past arguments and see how you blunder badly". But instead you just senselessly mixed up words and ended up saying absolutely nothing.

Here's another example:

"Your Grammar is painfully blundered".

See?

[Undefeated]

****, u just blatantly implied mab is a tune up ... i mean, pac is one bad dude, but brodeL, c'mon

I didn't mean it like that. What i was trying to say is that it would be a good fight for PAC and MAB. I forgot to add saying it's a good fight for both fighters. Tune up for both. I like MAB and i like Manny Pacqiao. But i think if they were to fight again i think MAB has what it takes to beat PAC and then making it a lil more interesting! lol

But IMO Barrera has accomplished more than PAC.

[DIEGO DA HITMAN]

Now you're not making any sense. It would be in your best interest to practice your Grammar a little (or a lot, preferably), if you don't want to sound like the uneducated piece of **** you actually are.

This lesson is for free. Your sentence should have read:

"Just look at your past arguments and see how you blunder badly". But instead you just senselessly mixed up words and ended up saying absolutely nothing.

Here's another example:

"Your Grammar is painfully blundered".

See?

That's just wrong, man. But it is funny. I'm picky about grammar myself. So I feel you...

[Sweat]

that is a good point but **** tyson was fightin like every other week for over a year or so and when he had the titles in the 80s he would fight like 3 times or 4 a year

****, I'll fight every other week too if I keep knocking everybody out in less than 4 rounds like what Tyson did on his prime. But taking a beating from a tough fight like Pacquiao-Morales 2, if I was the one that got hit a lot like that then I'll be taking my time off so I can fight better the next day and get away from serious injuries.

[morancito]

That's just wrong, man. But it is funny. I'm picky about grammar myself. So I feel you...

I'm normally not picky at all, but this **** is always trying to put down other posters, even fellow Pinoys, with some of the most asinine arguments concealed in what he thinks are superior writing skills.

[bigsmoothh]

But you got a ***** ass Mayorga as yours. Hope De La Hoya whoops that ****ers ass.

well what can i say. i like mayos slugger style, do you see me making 100 threads daily about him? i have rested now and im ready to start the arguing.




GO FORTH IN THE NAME OF OLYMPUS