Who Would You Rather Have a Conversation With.....

[Daylyt]

Pac: Just seems like a great guy to have a chat with, I'd try my best to convince him that fighting Khan is the best option for him next.

Canelo: Really a coin toss between him and Chavez Jr.

Hopkins: Seems like a very smart person with loads of wisdom both inside and outside (at least it seems to me) of the ring.

Broner: Garcia KOed Khan, so I wouldn't be able to help myself talk about possibly giving Khan a "rematch", so not sure how that would go.

Not on the list, but an honorary mention goes out to man dude Amir Khan.

check again my friend check again

[SilverMiles]

Seems TS add another option, I would have to go with Kahn. I like Brook the fighter but his voice agitates me.

[Build That Wall]

Lets Play A Game

Who Would You Rather Have a Conversation With.....

Now both of you are just sitting down in a room with nothing to do but to chop it up/have a conversation.


Mayweather or Pacquaio?

-Pacquaio just the more intresting man out the two

Canelo or Chavez jr?

-Chavez jr seems like he would have the most indepth convo being he is boxing royalty and all

Hopkins or Naazim

-Rather kill myself

Broner or D. Garcia

-Broner as danny probably say like 3 words the entire time and plus broner can reenact how he stole that old purse.

Amir Khan or Kell Brooks

-Amir Khan cause I dont know why I think this dude will just crack me up with how serious he takes himself and brooks seems boring to me.

Floyd: Would like to hear what his answers are to my questions

Chavez Jr: He learned english and therefore I can communicate with him

Hopkins: I would like to hear the knowledge he could bestow upon me.

Broner: Because he is my favorite fighter and because He would probably take me to some wild party after we talked.

Brook: Because when Khan sounds delusional, I don't know if I would be able to control my laughter and thats not how conversations are supposed to go.

[Check_hooks]

Pacquaio - Having a conversation with the only boxer in history to win 8 world titles in 8 different divisions and won FOTD is the type of thing you remember for the rest of your life.


Chavez jr - He seems more like a regular dude who likes to party

Hopkins - An inspiration for dedication and fitness. Also a true boxing historian

Broner - This is a tough one but Broner has some funny one liners

Amir Khan - I'd ask Amir about his sparring sessions with Pacquiao

[Build That Wall]

Manny for sure, he's much more humble like myself and can tell me all the stories of his humbling beginning to become one of the greatest fighters in the world.

Canelo, this one was hard for me but since Canelo speaks a little English and to my knowledge Chavez barely speaks any.

Hopkins would be my choice. He probably not the nice guy but you have to respect his longevity in the sport.

Hard choice as I think both guys are lame. But I guest I would choose Broner, convince him buying me a bunch of crap would increase his street cred and watch as he spends 1000's of dollars trying to impress me.

Chavez spoke English when he called out GGG. I remember after his last fight, he spoke english. Clear as day.

[#1Assassin]

what kind of moron would pass up on a chance to talk boxing with hopkins or naazim? thats no boxing fan as far as im concerned, BHop and naazim are two of the most knowledgeable people on the face of the earth as far as boxing goes and you are just going to pass that up? two men who have been part of some of the biggest fights in the last 20 years and one of the biggest accomplishments in the history of sports.

i would love to talk to either one of them, but i would pick hopkins if i had to choose. garcia over broner easily, broner seems annoying and full of himself while danny seems really cool. canelo over chavez jr, as tough as he is in teh ring jr is still a spoiled brat at the end of the day. brook over khan, because khan like broner is full of himself but even less intelligent. mayweather over pacquiao, he is one of the smartest boxers in history so i would love to pick his brain about the sport. plus i dont want to run the risk of pacquiao going all religious on me.

[////]

Mayweather or Pacquaio?

Neither, but I guess I could hold a polite conversation with Pacquaio.

I wouldn't let someone like Floyd into my home or associate with them in public at all.

Canelo or Chavez jr?

Chavez (most of the questions would be about his dad...)

Hopkins or Naazim

Naazim. He really knows boxing. He's not one of those guys who was just in the right place/right time. He knows his stuff.

Broner or D. Garcia

Garcia. See above comments about Floyd for Broner.

Amir Khan or Kell Brook

Khan, been in there with guys I'd wanna ask about.

[Daylyt]

what kind of moron would pass up on a chance to talk boxing with hopkins or naazim? thats no boxing fan as far as im concerned, BHop and naazim are two of the most knowledgeable people on the face of the earth as far as boxing goes and you are just going to pass that up? two men who have been part of some of the biggest fights in the last 20 years and one of the biggest accomplishments in the history of sports.

i would love to talk to either one of them, but i would pick hopkins if i had to choose. garcia over broner easily, broner seems annoying and full of himself while danny seems really cool. canelo over chavez jr, as tough as he is in teh ring jr is still a spoiled brat at the end of the day. brook over khan, because khan like broner is full of himself but even less intelligent. mayweather over pacquiao, he is one of the smartest boxers in history so i would love to pick his brain about the sport. plus i dont want to run the risk of pacquiao going all religious on me.

name calling that a bann-able offense my friend. DONT DO THAT ... to the batmobile

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=653730

Just like you think broner is annoying for your personal reasons I find Hopkins and Nazzim annoying for my personal reason.