Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: WBO: Avalos Withdraws From Rigondeaux Title Shot

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    Originally posted by Bardock View Post
    No because he can make more money fighting canelo. (****** dirk logic) or does that only apply to the fighters you suck off? Mr. Bidnessman
    That is my stance. I don't think Cotto is ducking Golovkin.

    I want to see if that guy has the same stance on a fighter he sucks off. I don't remember asking your f@ggot ass.

    We know you'll rim Santa Cruz's anus no matter who he fights.

    Comment


    • #82
      Originally posted by IHATEBOBARUM1 View Post
      After reading most of your posts i've come to the conclusion you are a full blown ******, haven't you heard his camp yet, starting with that midget barry mccguigan they will put the rigo fight on ice for now, that means the dont fancy their chances hence they are naming everyone under the sun apart from rigo ok noob.
      Aiming to fight other CHAMPIONS is not "holding the belt hostage".

      You spastics really need to understand what these terms mean before you start throwing them around.

      Comment


      • #83
        Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
        That is my stance. I don't think Cotto is ducking Golovkin.

        I want to see if that guy has the same stance on a fighter he sucks off. I don't remember asking your f@ggot ass.

        We know you'll rim Santa Cruz's anus no matter who he fights.
        If you dont think cotto is ducking then you're just a ****** plain and simple, stop posting.

        Comment


        • #84
          Originally posted by Scipio* View Post
          Ending Rigo's career how?
          He's undefeated and nobody cares about him. A loss would probably end his career. I think Mares beats him, .

          Comment


          • #85
            Originally posted by Bardock View Post
            If you dont cotto is ducking then you're just a ****** plain and simple, stop posting.
            Why would Cotto or anyone for that matter face Golovkin over Canelo?

            Stop posting?? Dude, you defend LEO SANTA CRUZ - one of the current biggest laughing stocks in the game right now and you're telling me to stop posting? Good lord!

            You don't even see the irony!

            Comment


            • #86
              Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
              Why would Cotto or anyone for that matter face Golovkin over Canelo?

              Stop posting?? Dude, you defend LEO SANTA CRUZ - one of the current biggest laughing stocks in the game right now and you're telling me to stop posting? Good lord!

              You don't even see the irony!
              Because they want to be established as the best in the middleweight division ??? LOL laughing stocks to who? SO by your logic LSC shouldnt face any of the other champions because hes making $1 million fighting bums so why should he face the other guys for less money? you see the irony in that? SO why do you criticize him then?

              Im not defending anybody ****** I actually want LSC to face everyone starting with Rigo but on the other hand you dont want the fighter YOU DEFEND fighting rigo because they can make more money without him. do you see the irony in that? I'm done here hahaahah

              Comment


              • #87
                Originally posted by VAGAB0ND View Post
                He's undefeated and nobody cares about him. A loss would probably end his career. I think Mares beats him, .
                Try not to think. Nobody will beat Guillermo Rigondeaux from 118 to 130 especially Abner Mares.

                Comment


                • #88
                  Originally posted by Bardock View Post
                  Because they want to be established as the best in the middleweight division ??? LOL laughing stocks to who? SO by your logic LSC shouldnt face any of the other champions because hes making $1 million fighting bums so why should he face the other guys for less money? you see the irony in that? SO why do you criticize him then?

                  Im not defending anybody ****** I actually want LSC to face everyone starting with Rigo but on the other hand you dont want the fighter YOU DEFEND fighting rigo because they can make more money without him. do you see the irony in that? I'm done here hahaahah
                  Uhhh dude I don't think Dirk cares one way or the other about whether Avalos fights Rigo or Frampton. The idea that Avalos has a bunch of fans here defending his move to not fight Rigo is pretty funny; I've never even heard of him outside of this situation and I haven't seen anyone else claim to be a follower of him either.

                  "Fight easier opponents for more money" is good logic if you're the fighter stepping into the ring. The entire business of boxing is about taking calculated risks both in the short-term and long-term.

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    Originally posted by Pigeons View Post
                    Rigondeaux is the lineal champ at junior featherweight. He is also one the 5-10 best fighters in the world. Choosing to fight a beltholder at junior featherweight instead of one of the best fighters in the world is a duck.

                    If Stevenson going to SHO to fight Hopkins instead of Kovalev is a duck, then this is the definition of a duck.

                    More money doe.
                    I totally agree a duck is a duck! no other way arround it. I just would love Rigo would leave his present promotional company, they will not bring money to the table to entice or encurage other fighters to fight him unlike Mayweather.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP