The Special Shakes point is not moot because Ariza is working with Floyd

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Free Booty Dew!
    Banned
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Sep 2014
    • 504
    • 24
    • 21
    • 645

    #121
    Originally posted by KevinHenry007
    You guys really aren't that smart.

    If a guy robbed a liquor store back in 1989 and was in the same area when a robbery occured in 2009, that means he robbed the store because he did so in 1989.

    You are literally ******ed with logic.
    And you are ******ed with your analogy.

    You're looking like an absolute Fl0mo wally.

    Then again I'm not surprised, Floyd's bumsniffs will defend any and everything he does.

    Comment

    • KevinHenry007
      Banned
      • Jul 2014
      • 278
      • 17
      • 11
      • 398

      #122
      Hey ******s, in order to be on Performance Enhancing Drugs, you have to at least have an enhanced performance.

      Not being able to at least bust Marcos Maidana's lips in 24 rounds does not say anything about having an enhanced performance.

      Is Floyd a hypocrite? Absolutely

      Is he using performance enhancing drugs? Based on his previous performances absolutely not.

      Does him signing with Ariza yesterday take away from the fact that Pac was juicing in 08/09? No.

      Comment

      • KevinHenry007
        Banned
        • Jul 2014
        • 278
        • 17
        • 11
        • 398

        #123
        Originally posted by Free Booty Dew!
        And you are ******ed with your analogy.

        You're looking like an absolute Fl0mo wally.

        Then again I'm not surprised, Floyd's bumsniffs will defend any and everything he does.
        Of course, continue on with your lame Ad-hominem attacks because that's all you can do.

        You can't attack anything I say, so you attack me as a person. That's just brilliant!

        Comment

        • bojangles1987
          bo jungle
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jul 2009
          • 41118
          • 1,326
          • 357
          • 63,028

          #124
          Originally posted by KevinHenry007
          You guys really aren't that smart.

          If a guy robbed a liquor store back in 1989 and was in the same area when a robbery occured in 2009, that means he robbed the store because he did so in 1989.

          You are literally ******ed with logic.
          If that guy was a known liquor store robber and had been busted robbing a liquor store two years ago, yeah, I'd be su****ious.

          And what a horrible, horrible analogy.

          Comment

          • Free Booty Dew!
            Banned
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Sep 2014
            • 504
            • 24
            • 21
            • 645

            #125
            Originally posted by KevinHenry007
            Of course, continue on with your lame Ad-hominem attacks because that's all you can do.

            You can't attack anything I say, so you attack me as a person. That's just brilliant!
            The premise of your argument is that PAC was on PEDs in 08/09 because of his performances... despite him being at the age where most fighters reach their absolute prime.

            Oscar was drained.

            Cotto had been hurt by lesser fighters than Pac and had been stopped before.

            Hatton came rushing in with his hands down and a non existent defence.

            And like I mentioned earlier, Pac was in his absolute prime.

            Comment

            • KevinHenry007
              Banned
              • Jul 2014
              • 278
              • 17
              • 11
              • 398

              #126
              Originally posted by Sugar Adam Ali
              PEDS dont change a fighter, they enhance a fighter...

              Floyd will be quicker, fresher legs, and will have great movement and explosiveness like he had vs Gatti..
              Its not going to turn him into a ko machine
              Again, you're predicting the future.

              How do you know PED's don't enhance power? History says otherwise. Take baseball for instance. Bonds, Sosa, McGwire, Canseco, etc all start hitting with much more power after getting on them.

              Floyd had quicker legs in the 2nd Maidana fight than he had in the first fight. I guess he was on PED's in the second fight because his legs were quicker, right?

              What you said would be true if only Maidana didn't say Floyd still hit like a b1tch. This is strange coming from someone who's very susceptible to being dropped and hurt as shown throughout Maidana's career.

              Comment

              • Spacey1991
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Jan 2009
                • 8885
                • 247
                • 282
                • 18,684

                #127
                Originally posted by KevinHenry007
                Floyd is one of the biggest hypocrite's out there. He's done worse in the past. But being a hypocrite doesn't make him a PED user today and doesn't change the fact that Ariza supplied Pac with PED's in 08/09.

                We'll have to see if Floyd is juicing based on his future performances.

                If he KO's Cotto, GGG, Andrade, Thurman, etc in the first 2-3 rounds, then we'll know something is up and that Floyd is on that good stuff.

                Hey, Sugar Adam Ali, where's those lottery numbers at?
                If Floyd was certain Ariza was giving Manny steroids, and wants to clean up the sport of Boxing like he claims, then why would he hire Ariza?

                I'm not saying he is or isn't on steroids, and I'm not saying Manny was either (I thought his reaction to the testing the first time around was su****ious but whatever), the fact of the matter is, hes pretty much accused Ariza of being shady and then hes gone on to hire him, he is going to be put on blast for that, its inevitable.

                Comment

                • KevinHenry007
                  Banned
                  • Jul 2014
                  • 278
                  • 17
                  • 11
                  • 398

                  #128
                  Originally posted by bojangles1987
                  If that guy was a known liquor store robber and had been busted robbing a liquor store two years ago, yeah, I'd be su****ious.

                  And what a horrible, horrible analogy.
                  I didn't say anything about being a "known" anything. YOU made that up. I said if a guy robbed a store in 1989 and is in the area during a store robbery 20 years later, does that make him guilty or no?

                  Comment

                  • Sugar Adam Ali
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Apr 2013
                    • 27630
                    • 970
                    • 1,174
                    • 82,827

                    #129
                    Originally posted by KevinHenry007
                    Hey ******s, in order to be on Performance Enhancing Drugs, you have to at least have an enhanced performance.

                    Not being able to at least bust Marcos Maidana's lips in 24 rounds does not say anything about having an enhanced performance.

                    Is Floyd a hypocrite? Absolutely

                    Is he using performance enhancing drugs? Based on his previous performances absolutely not.

                    Does him signing with Ariza yesterday take away from the fact that Pac was juicing in 08/09? No.
                    Ariza wasnt with floyd in the maidana fights... Why are you using old fights to make your claims

                    Comment

                    • Free Booty Dew!
                      Banned
                      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                      • Sep 2014
                      • 504
                      • 24
                      • 21
                      • 645

                      #130
                      Originally posted by KevinHenry007
                      I didn't say anything about being a "known" anything. YOU made that up. I said if a guy robbed a store in 1989 and is in the area during a store robbery 20 years later, does that make him guilty or no?
                      IQ below 90 confirmed.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP