Comments Thread For: Carl Froch, George Groves Trade Words at Wembley

[BIGPOPPAPUMP]

George Groves is back in the mix after losing back to back fights to Carl Froch. Groves on a twelve round unanimous decision over Christopher Rebrasse at Wembley Arena to claim Rebrasse's European super middleweight crown and the vacant WBC silver title. The fight also doubled as a final eliminator for the WBC world title, which means Groves could now face full WBC champion Anthony Dirrell.

[Click Here To Read More]

[mrbigshot]

Fair play, Froch won - but i still think he's a arrogant cvnt - who's pretty fake.

all this crap playing upto the fight - FAKE

there's no needle with me

then you start insulting him, hmmmm very strange maybe you should consult your psychiatrist

who will tell you what to say

[Ric1889]

I dont think they were exactly 'trading words', Groves was respectful of Froch and Froch acted like an arrogant kid.

[thack]

Doesn't Froch make you cringe, playful ,respectful banter from Groves and Froch yet again behaves like a twat!..Never mind about Groves or Chavez jr. start calling out Ward who gave you a pasting. a legend, as Calzaghe rightly says not even the best fighter in his own division !!

[LacedUp]

Fair play, Froch won - but i still think he's a arrogant cvnt - who's pretty fake.

all this crap playing upto the fight - FAKE

there's no needle with me

then you start insulting him, hmmmm very strange maybe you should consult your psychiatrist

who will tell you what to say

I dont think they were exactly 'trading words', Groves was respectful of Froch and Froch acted like an arrogant kid.

Doesn't Froch make you cringe, playful ,respectful banter from Groves and Froch yet again behaves like a twat!..Never mind about Groves or Chavez jr. start calling out Ward who gave you a pasting. a legend, as Calzaghe rightly says not even the best fighter in his own division !!

To be fair to froch, groves did start out by saying he's "dancing around" which might have been said as a joke but it could be misinterpreted as disrespect.

[Johnwoo8686]

Froch is right, when you're 2-0 against a guy there's no need for rematch. Especially when both ended in stoppages, the second one by a brutal stoppage.

[MDPopescu]

As I've watched on TV, Froch was "trading words" with commentators near the ring, not with Groves... Am I wrong?

[robbyheartbaby]

You have to love Froch, Groves should want no part of him, but Groves is young, brash & arrogant blah blah blah, like every young fighter is, but he had his arse handed to him twice by a superior fighter in Froch so he should move on.

[hugh grant]

Reminds me of Pac v JMM. Pac beat him 3 times, yet JMM still thought if he got enough rematches he might beat Pac, and voila like magic he puts Pac to sleep.

WHo knows, if Maidana fought Floyd for the 3 time he might ko Floyd as well, you never know.

But come on man, George, at least beat Dirrel first. I think you need to rematch chunky first.

[NapalmKnuckles]

Reminds me of Pac v JMM. Pac beat him 3 times, yet JMM still thought if he got enough rematches he might beat Pac, and voila like magic he puts Pac to sleep.

This is NOTHING like Pac vs JMM
1. Pac didn't beat JMM 3 times, not even officially. First fight was scored a draw. Fights 2 & 3 were scored in Pac's favor. JMM had the only definitive, non negotiable, uncontroversial victory in the 4th fight. Pac never stopped JMM like Froch stopped Groves. Pacquiao never convincingly defeated jmm.