Comments Thread For: Anthony Dirrell Rips Groves, Says Froch is Possible

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bigjavi973
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Oct 2013
    • 24007
    • 759
    • 1,480
    • 1,236,071

    #11
    dirrell just got the belt and now he's *****ing about who hes fighting. MFr sounds shook. Renan St Juste was a freakin nobody and it was a wbc title eliminator. smh

    Comment

    • Weebler I
      El Weeblerito I
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Dec 2007
      • 31092
      • 1,459
      • 1,648
      • 54,550

      #12
      I'd love to see Froch v Anthony Dirrell.

      Comment

      • removed
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Nov 2008
        • 21479
        • 4,005
        • 831
        • 164,542

        #13
        Originally posted by torosboxing75
        Dirrell beats him just like his brother did.


        His brother lost btw. Here's a reminder.

        Comment

        • jayjames616
          Interim Champion
          Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
          • Jan 2012
          • 985
          • 37
          • 0
          • 7,166

          #14
          What did he say wrong? Groves doesn't deserve a shot. He just got stopped twice in a row. He says Froch is a good fighter that he would fight just not in the UK. Unfortunately for Dirrell Froch is the fighter with the name and would definitely call the shots. I don't blame Dirrell for not wanting to go over there after what happened with Andre.

          Comment

          • ChestRockwell
            Contender
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • Jun 2010
            • 435
            • 41
            • 10
            • 6,557

            #15
            We'll have to see how Groves looks on Saturday, but Dirrell has absolutley no right to be calling any shots. He just beat a shot Sakio Bika in a piss poor performance and doesn't really have any other name to his credit. Pulling the brother's revenge card is a nice try, but I think most fans can see through that. That being said, I'd pick Groves over Dirrell anyway.

            Comment

            • ncboxingfan
              Up and Comer
              Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
              • Oct 2006
              • 43
              • 5
              • 0
              • 6,230

              #16
              Originally posted by bigjavi973
              dirrell just got the belt and now he's *****ing about who hes fighting. MFr sounds shook. Renan St Juste was a freakin nobody and it was a wbc title eliminator. smh
              Someone said that Dirrell doesn't deserve to lace Froch's boots?? Are you kidding me. Andre Dirrell clearly gave Froch a boxing lesson but didn't get the nod. Froch isn't the best at 168, but he should get a fight with Anthony Dirrell before Groves does. The last time I checked, losing 2 fights in row doesn't earn you a right to fight for an eliminator?? I don't know, call me ****** but that truly doesn't make any sense. Have groves fight Saiko Bika or even a shop worn Mikkel Kessler and see how he fairs in those. I think Bika stops him early unless groves get on his toes and box. BTW THIS ISN'T A USA vs EUROPE rant, instead a boxer vs boxer one. Everyone knows if Andre and Carl had of been on neutral ground Froch would have lost hands down. BE OBJECTIVE PEOPLE and stop with the unnecessary hating.
              Last edited by ncboxingfan; 09-18-2014, 10:27 AM.

              Comment

              • MrFynest
                Interim Champion
                Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                • Nov 2009
                • 983
                • 57
                • 8
                • 14,113

                #17
                He does make a point. How does a guy like Groves who's been KO'd twice in a row get to fight for a mandatory shot in his next fight? All these organizations are a joke.

                Comment

                • ncboxingfan
                  Up and Comer
                  Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
                  • Oct 2006
                  • 43
                  • 5
                  • 0
                  • 6,230

                  #18
                  Originally posted by denium
                  Dirrell isn't fit to lace Froch's boots. I hope him & Froch have a fight, easy night's work for Carl & another belt to add to the collection.
                  Dirrell doesn't deserve to lace Froch's boots?? Are you kidding me? Andre Dirrell clearly gave Froch a boxing lesson but didn't get the nod. Froch isn't the best at 168, but he should get a fight with Anthony Dirrell before Groves does. The last time I checked, losing 2 fights in row doesn't earn you a right to fight for an eliminator?? I don't know, call me ****** but that truly doesn't make any sense. Have groves fight Saiko Bika or even a shop worn Mikkel Kessler and see how he fairs in those. I think Bika stops Groves early unless he gets on his toes and box. BTW THIS ISN'T A USA vs EUROPE rant, instead a boxer vs boxer one. Everyone knows if Andre and Carl had of been on neutral ground, Froch would have lost hands down. BE OBJECTIVE PEOPLE and stop with the unnecessary hating.

                  Comment

                  • Dirk Diggler UK
                    Deleted
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jun 2008
                    • 48836
                    • 1,312
                    • 693
                    • 58,902

                    #19
                    Originally posted by torosboxing75
                    Dirrell beats him just like his brother did.
                    Are these guys gonna become the new Klitsckos around here where people think they're the same person.

                    Anthony is **** compared to his brother.

                    Comment

                    • removed
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Nov 2008
                      • 21479
                      • 4,005
                      • 831
                      • 164,542

                      #20
                      Originally posted by ncboxingfan
                      Dirrell doesn't deserve to lace Froch's boots?? Are you kidding me? Andre Dirrell clearly gave Froch a boxing lesson but didn't get the nod. Froch isn't the best at 168, but he should get a fight with Anthony Dirrell before Groves does. The last time I checked, losing 2 fights in row doesn't earn you a right to fight for an eliminator?? I don't know, call me ****** but that truly doesn't make any sense. Have groves fight Saiko Bika or even a shop worn Mikkel Kessler and see how he fairs in those. I think Bika stops Groves early unless he gets on his toes and box. BTW THIS ISN'T A USA vs EUROPE rant, instead a boxer vs boxer one. Everyone knows if Andre and Carl had of been on neutral ground, Froch would have lost hands down. BE OBJECTIVE PEOPLE and stop with the unnecessary hating.
                      Andre literally ran away from Froch all night, completely stunk the place out & generally acted like a little b1tch. It was a close fight but no way did he deserve to take home the champions belt that night. Anyway back on topic.

                      Groves probably has jumped the queue but guess what, that boxing! I don't see you or Dirrell crying about Chavez Jr's ranking, what's he done at SMW?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP