Why Are The Young Guys Dangerous For Floyd?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • -Kev-
    this is boxing
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Dec 2006
    • 39960
    • 5,045
    • 1,449
    • 234,543

    #21
    Originally posted by IronDanHamza
    Agree 100%.

    I think Amir Khan has the best chance of beating Mayweather at this point.

    That saddens me but that's how I feel.
    I think the one's with the best chance have already been beaten + Lara and Pacquiao. Canelo and Cotto are the two with the best chances and they already lost. After that I would put Lara and Pacquiao(From the one's he hasn't fought). I would actually put Lara first, then Canelo, Cotto/Pacquiao.

    With Charlo's style, height and reach, he could pose some problems for Mayweather. The last time Floyd fought such tall fighters were Hernandez and Corrales, but Charlo's style is much different obviously. At 5' 11" and as young and quick as he is, and Floyd being short, smaller, aging, slower, Jermell Charlo could actually be the wildcard. Not like it would ever happen. I just see Charlo as more dangerous than Khan.

    Comment

    • radioraheem
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • May 2010
      • 5915
      • 165
      • 200
      • 12,234

      #22
      Originally posted by Truth.
      Thurman likes to fight on the backfoot at the opponent's pace, he won't put Floyd under relentless pressure and it would be more of a boxing match, which obviously favours Floyd.

      Porter and Khan have a good chance of beating Floyd.

      Porter is a better version of Maidana, he's more athletic, physically stronger (therefore harder to clinch), has good footwork and can keep up with Floyd at least to some extent and has a good jab although he didn't show it against Brook.

      Against Khan, I think Floyd would fight on the frontfoot and try to get on the inside and hurt Khan, but Khan with his speed and jab would definitely find Floyd. Floyd was getting hit and out-jabbed by Maidana in patches yesterday, he's slowed down and isn't the same fighter anymore.

      Of course Pac can beat him as well but that fight's not gonna happen.
      Porter is NOT a better version of Maidana. Not even close. Porter's style is very different. Porter isn't even that awkward to begin with, nor is he very reckless and blatantly dirty. Porter is aggressive though. But don't mistake his aggressiveness for being a style equivalent of Maidana. Porter doesn't even have a good jab.

      Comment

      • John Locke
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Sep 2013
        • 7818
        • 411
        • 287
        • 40,060

        #23
        Originally posted by -Kev-
        I think the one's with the best chance have already been beaten + Lara and Pacquiao. Canelo and Cotto are the two with the best chances and they already lost. After that I would put Lara and Pacquiao(From the one's he hasn't fought). I would actually put Lara first, then Canelo, Cotto/Pacquiao.

        With Charlo's style, height and reach, he could pose some problems for Mayweather. The last time Floyd fought such tall fighters were Hernandez and Corrales, but Charlo's style is much different obviously. At 5' 11" and as young and quick as he is, and Floyd being short, smaller, aging, slower, Jermell Charlo could actually be the wildcard. Not like it would ever happen. I just see Charlo as more dangerous than Khan.
        Andrade and the Charlos would definitely cause Floyd big problems, especially Andrade. 6'1 southpaw with a jab, footwork and good punch output.

        Comment

        • Sugar Adam Ali
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Apr 2013
          • 27630
          • 970
          • 1,174
          • 82,827

          #24
          Originally posted by IronDanHamza
          True, true.

          Luckily he has a very good chin.
          Floyds chin is very underrated... He has taken flush shots, and doesnt even blink.. there was the 3rd rd vs shane, but other than that, i have never seen him hurt, even when good punchers like maidana, cotto, castillo, zab, all landed on him, but it doesnt faze floyd...
          Criminally underrated chin IMO

          Originally posted by IronDanHamza
          Khans speed in both hand and feet, output and jab combined with Floyds age and level of decline is going to cause major problems for Floyd.

          I really just can't see how it won't.

          Khan will land the jab, a lot.
          The jab, and also the combinations... Floyd hasnt see combinations with fast hands in a long time... And khan has some power, not a huge puncher but if he lands he can do damage...
          If khan can stay composed, and not get sloppy, i think he can outpoint floyd

          Comment

          • Sugar Adam Ali
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Apr 2013
            • 27630
            • 970
            • 1,174
            • 82,827

            #25
            Originally posted by Truth.
            Andrade and the Charlos would definitely cause Floyd big problems, especially Andrade. 6'1 southpaw with a jab, footwork and good punch output.
            yeah, any legit 154 fighter with skills is gonna cause floyd problems..

            Comment

            • John Locke
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Sep 2013
              • 7818
              • 411
              • 287
              • 40,060

              #26
              Originally posted by radioraheem
              Porter is NOT a better version of Maidana. Not even close. Porter's style is very different. Porter isn't even that awkward to begin with, nor is he very reckless and blatantly dirty. Porter is aggressive though. But don't mistake his aggressiveness for being a style equivalent of Maidana. Porter doesn't even have a good jab.
              Porter is definitely better than Maidana and he does have a good jab. Are you judging him based on the Brook fight alone?

              His style isn't identical to Maidana's but they have similarities, Porter is just as aggressive but more skilled, much stronger physically, but doesn't hit as hard.

              Comment

              • John Locke
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Sep 2013
                • 7818
                • 411
                • 287
                • 40,060

                #27
                Originally posted by Sugar Adam Ali
                Floyds chin is very underrated... He has taken flush shots, and doesnt even blink.. there was the 3rd rd vs shane, but other than that, i have never seen him hurt, even when good punchers like maidana, cotto, castillo, zab, all landed on him, but it doesnt faze floyd...
                Criminally underrated chin IMO
                He was badly buzzed at the end of the 3rd yesterday, his legs froze. But yeah he has got a good chin.

                Comment

                • _original_
                  Dinamita
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Jul 2009
                  • 17838
                  • 1,872
                  • 789
                  • 67,167

                  #28
                  Originally posted by Truth.
                  Porter is definitely better than Maidana and he does have a good jab. Are you judging him based on the Brook fight alone?

                  His style isn't identical to Maidana's but they have similarities, Porter is just as aggressive but more skilled, much stronger physically, but doesn't hit as hard.

                  lol no he's not, Maidana is the better fighter and it's pretty obvious to see. It's not just the Brook fight one has to see, go look at the first Diaz meeting. Maidana has deceptive skills and a good jab, Porter just uses dumb aggression and athleticism with no thinking to try to bully fighters.

                  Comment

                  • John Locke
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Sep 2013
                    • 7818
                    • 411
                    • 287
                    • 40,060

                    #29
                    Originally posted by _original_
                    lol no he's not, Maidana is the better fighter and it's pretty obvious to see. It's not just the Brook fight one has to see, go look at the first Diaz meeting. Maidana has deceptive skills and a good jab, Porter just uses dumb aggression and athleticism with no thinking to try to bully fighters.
                    I've seen the first Diaz fight, had Porter winning 7-3. That was an off night and clearly not Porter at his best anyway, look what happened in the rematch.

                    But whatever, if that's what you think...

                    Porter already has a better resume than Maidana and he hasn't even been in the spot light for that long, he's still new on the scene. By the end of his career he will have achieved a lot more than Maidana in this sport.

                    Comment

                    • Sugar Adam Ali
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Apr 2013
                      • 27630
                      • 970
                      • 1,174
                      • 82,827

                      #30
                      Maidana better than porter...

                      Porter is a rugged customer, that gets by with physicality.. He will have a nice run in his youth but eventually he will be in the same club as samuel peter, jeff lacy, tavoris cloud

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP