After I order the PPV and watch the fight with all my casual boxing fan friends, I re-watch the fight with the sound off. 2 total different experiences. Watching a fight with the tv on mute paints the real picture. I'm happy Mayweather ditched HBO I would get sick of there biased commentating, especially Larry.
At the end of the day Mayweather is going to school Maidana, and then on to the next victim. Hate it or love it, end of story.
After I order the PPV and watch the fight with all my casual boxing fan friends, I re-watch the fight with the sound off. 2 total different experiences. Watching a fight with the tv on mute paints the real picture. I'm happy Mayweather ditched HBO I would get sick of there biased commentating, especially Larry.
At the end of the day Mayweather is going to school Maidana, and then on to the next victim. Hate it or love it, end of story.
What? Showtime is biased too. You had to watch it on mute? There on floyds nuts the whole time
After I order the PPV and watch the fight with all my casual boxing fan friends, I re-watch the fight with the sound off. 2 total different experiences. Watching a fight with the tv on mute paints the real picture. I'm happy Mayweather ditched HBO I would get sick of there biased commentating, especially Larry.
At the end of the day Mayweather is going to school Maidana, and then on to the next victim. Hate it or love it, end of story.
I couldn't agree with you more. It's easy for the human mind to be persuaded, especially when the one's doing the persuading are the so called experts. (My opinion, I don't thinks it’s scientific). But when you're there watching a fight and the commentators are getting excited, I think it tends to cloud the judgment of the viewer. I saw the Mayweather-Maidana fight on replay today, and I took a buddy's advice and muted it. I didn't mute the entire fight just a few rounds, and yes it's a different experience. I think everyone should do that from time to time, it definitely paints a different picture.
On another note, for arguments sake, if Maidana truly did beat Mayweather the first time, doesn't he deserve a rematch to prove he is the better fighter. Floyd granted the rematch, for whatever reason that is, and people on this forum are complaining about it. Yet if he didn't give him the rematch, it would further prove that Maidana "whooped" his ass and Floyd is scared. I mean come on really? I can dig that a lot of people dislike and discredit Mayweather, everyone is entitled to his or her opinion of a person. I could do without some of his foolishness outside the ring, but it still doesn't change the fact that inside the ring, he is pretty awesome to watch.
BTW my favorite boxers are as follows:
Miguel Cotto, Sergio Martinez, Floyd Mayweather, Juan Manuel Marquez, Amir Khan, Guillermo Rigondeaux, Erislandy Lara, Vasyl Lomachenko, Chad Dawson, Mikkel Kessler, Bernard Hopkins, and Wladimir Klitschko
Floyd is a lot smarter than people give him credit for, if he would have responded, then that would have given .50 more ammo to be more relevant in Boxing, but instead silence gives him no more ammo - .50 is the worst kind of person, burned his own home down because one of the mothers of his children was staying there with his child, he doesn't go to his son's graduation, disowned his son on social media, snitches on cats, turns his back on Al Haymon the person who introduced him to Mayweather, the person that got Mayweather to invest is a couple of .50's tours. this is why Floyd is so good, he has Kobe / Jordan / bhop discipline - focus on camp(get the work out the way) then deal with the Media and answer the BS questions . you smother a fire, don't give it any air..
Only floyd fans think that. Everyone else is still waiting for him to fight pacquiao. Oh thats right, "We dont fight for the fans to see whos the best."FMJ
An honest advice Big. Have your head examined. Your obsession with everything that has to do with Mayweather borders on the level of insanity and absurdity.
Comment