Is Algieri better than Broner? He beat Taylor more easily

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Foreign Soil
    First Time Skeptic
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jul 2013
    • 5249
    • 194
    • 219
    • 11,783

    #91
    Originally posted by The Big Dunn
    Yeah, right. Just because he out boxed a low skilled brawler like Provodnikov doesn't mean he can outbox Broner.
    Newsflash - Broner isn't more skilled than Provodnikov. They're both brawlers.

    Comment

    • GOD-FR33
      "SRL is tha G.O.A.T."
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jun 2008
      • 3022
      • 284
      • 495
      • 9,840

      #92
      You're right.........

      You're right, man. Here's why. Broner will fight ANYONE. Floyd won't and will make excuses as to why he won't fight anyone. Broner has tremendous heart/balls and comes to KO you. Floyd could have a lesser fighter in front of him, and because he's so defensive-minded, he retreats and goes into survival mode. In conclusion, never in the history of boxing have we seen a fighter with Floyd's skill, continuously duck the best available fights. His excuses and diva-like demands are bizarre and that's just not how REAL fighters conduct themselves. He's a great fighter that I would be a fan of if he gave us fans what we really want. Fighting guys like The Ghost, Ortiz, a drained Canelo, and going life and death with Maidana, don't make you an ATG. You have to face adversity/risk to become a legend. He's just a mere HOF'mer.

      Comment

      • dibzvincent143
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Mar 2009
        • 5343
        • 359
        • 204
        • 52,527

        #93
        Havent seen much of algieri to decide. One thing i can say is that styles make fights. I wish those cold wars and ducking didnt exist, boxing wouldve been one of the top sports.

        Comment

        • 2fast2strong
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Sep 2014
          • 1306
          • 317
          • 31
          • 13,329

          #94
          Originally posted by Freedom2014
          Really?

          What about Big Dunn, HanzGruber, 2fast2strong, BrushMyHair, Burner, ShoulderRoll, LarryX, Brandish, IronDanHamza (who denies it but defends Broner) etc.

          All Mayweather fans.
          No I am not a Mayweather fan, I am actually more of an MMA guy and in MMA I like finishers meaning fighters who take chances and try to get their opponent out of there by submission or knock out.

          Fighters like JDS, Bones Jones, Fedor .. But I did not care for one of the greatest MMA fighters of all time in George Saint Pierre

          George Saint Pierre was MMA's equivalent of Floyd Mayweather as in he was an all most unbeatable point fighter who could never finish a fight.

          When I watch a fight I like the suspense of watching a possible knock out and Mayweather fights offer no such return.

          So no I am not a Mayweather fan.

          Comment

          • CatchAndShoot
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Feb 2014
            • 3534
            • 257
            • 202
            • 17,533

            #95
            Look at the Floyd fans trying to make an argument that Broner is better, just because Pac's about to fight Algieri.

            Comment

            • Caught Square
              CS*
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Aug 2014
              • 2518
              • 87
              • 52
              • 24,866

              #96
              Algeiri probably would beat Broner but those triangle theories have been proven wrong time and time again, people only use it when it suits their argument.

              Comment

              • CatchAndShoot
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Feb 2014
                • 3534
                • 257
                • 202
                • 17,533

                #97
                Originally posted by Caught Square
                Algeiri probably would beat Broner but those triangle theories have been proven wrong time and time again, people only use it when it suits their argument.
                Forget the triangle theories. He's just the better boxer. It's so easy to see.

                "If Broner used his legs more, he'd be better. If Broner was more active, h'ed be better. If Broner was better at defense, he's be better. If Broner didn't always get caught along the ropes, he'd be better."

                Well no **** Sherlock, that's why he's not better.

                Comment

                • bojangles1987
                  bo jungle
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Jul 2009
                  • 41118
                  • 1,326
                  • 357
                  • 63,028

                  #98
                  Originally posted by IronDanHamza
                  Right, of course there are Mayweather fans who are also Broner fans but there's a pretty decent list of guys who are Broner fans and aren't Mayweather fans meaning your notion of "all" fans being fans of the other is frankly false.

                  You included my name in there. I am far from a Broner fan. Really, far from it.

                  Don't rate nor like the guy and have been criticising his ability and overall completion for a while now.
                  Pssh. You're always nuthugging Broner, stop lying.

                  Comment

                  • Caught Square
                    CS*
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Aug 2014
                    • 2518
                    • 87
                    • 52
                    • 24,866

                    #99
                    Originally posted by CatchAndShoot
                    Forget the triangle theories. He's just the better boxer. It's so easy to see.

                    "If Broner used his legs more, he'd be better. If Broner was more active, h'ed be better. If Broner was better at defense, he's be better. If Broner didn't always get caught along the ropes, he'd be better."

                    Well no **** Sherlock, that's why he's not better.
                    lol i never said none of the quoted but the reason i mentioned triangle theories is because that's what the guy said in the title.

                    Like i said, i would favour Algeiri to beat Broner.

                    Comment

                    • BostonGuy
                      Emeritus Champion
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Feb 2008
                      • 13343
                      • 2,119
                      • 6,833
                      • 900,690,265

                      #100
                      Originally posted by Beercules
                      Also Broner falls into lulls of inactivity often and it costs him rounds.

                      Algieri doesn't.

                      Algieri is a disciplined fighter.

                      Broner isn't.
                      Algieri couldn't bust a g**** in a fruit fight

                      Broner has power and his punches are thudding when he sits down on 'em

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP