Comments Thread For: Groves Focused on Dirrell Title Shot, Eyes Froch Trilogy

[Dirk Diggler UK]

But seriously this is a joke, he can't just walk in to get a title. He hasn't proven to be world class against top super middleweights. I think Either of the Dirrells could beat him handily.

Well we'll find out if he becomes mandatory, won't we?

[black.ink]

I'd back him against Anthony.

[nycsmooth]

it's all about connections, especially w/WBC/A...look @ JCC jr & his 2 "wins" vs Vera & he was made mandatory...Good 4 Groves 2 get a $$ bout but he won't beat Dirrell , especially in CA...

[thejohnboy]

I think he has a good chance against Anthony Dirrell I've never been that impressed, he wouldn't beat Andre though.

[LacedUp]

Anthony Dirrell has the WBC title, George. Not Andre.

He said Anthony Dirrell in an interview.

It was a bit tongue in cheek the part about Froch. He said that with a slight grin on his face.

[bojangles1987]

Dirrell/Groves is a good fight.

A Froch trilogy isn't happening. Groves got knocked flat.

[bojangles1987]

Well we'll find out if he becomes mandatory, won't we?

Not if today proved anything about Haymon champions and their mandatory defenses.