Tweet
IF Peds is such a big problem in boxing, why don't just allow it??
I mean why give unfair advantage to people if they allowed it= everyone takes peds= no unfair advantage simple really...
-
-
I agree with this. But hey, truth is, they are being used by most fighters so.
I like fighters on PEDs, it makes for more entertaining fights. Humans on normal status are boring, they gas out and can't provide as much excitement as they can at peak performance level. -
They should. Let all athletes use them. **** it.Comment
-
Are you guys serious??????? After this what? Allow all to use plaster?? How can we differentiate the greats from the journeymen if the difference is only because he was taking a better PED?Comment
-
The adverse side effects is a good reason not to allow it.
And when do you start to take peds in sport, when you are 15 so you can make the team?
Its not like boxing takes testing seriously any way.Comment
-
You guys sound like a bunch of MMA fans.........how do you separate the pros from the joes?Comment
-
F that ish. Morals is morals. An athlete should be able to perform without enhancement drugs. IMO no different from plastered hand wraps. Look at what happened to Margarito after they caught him.... look at Marquez's performance during the Bradley fight. It's a big big change with it, or without it.
Call me *******.... 2-0 with VADA on his nuts.Comment
-
Would anyone want there son fighting in a sport like that.
It would not come down to who had the better skills or will but who had the better drugs.Comment
-
why not allow baseball bats to all fighters ? everyone will have the same advantage
why not allow bricks in gloves ? everyone will have the same advantage
On a serious note, even if they allow Peds, fighters will still not be equals. It will be a war of who gets the best chemist and laboratory and who has the most budget to pay for expensive peds.
Btw, if you want to see fighting with peds allowed, there is already something for that, mmaComment
Comment