Wow, you say things that make me scratch my head. The fight would not have done nowhere near $300m in PPV revenue. It would've done maybe $200m tops.
And even then, the promoters (Mayweather Promotions, Golden Boy) only get 45% after cable, satellite and the broadcaster have been broken off. That leaves $90m.
Of that, Pacquiao would've gotten $45m (adjusted) -- so he would've gotten a cut of PPV -- leaving half for Floyd plus the $30m or so in gate and foreign rights.
As for the "fight for free" offer, Mayweather did respond. He says he doesn't fight for free. The end.
Is he a noble guy who fights for the fans or is he the guy who should be business first by turning that fight down? (Anytime my a**...) You seem to waver irrationally between the two.
If he really, truly was willing to fight for free, why not fight Mayweather for more than he would see in two fights?
It is what it is. Name calling doesn't change the facts, my man. It only strengthens my point.
And even then, the promoters (Mayweather Promotions, Golden Boy) only get 45% after cable, satellite and the broadcaster have been broken off. That leaves $90m.
Of that, Pacquiao would've gotten $45m (adjusted) -- so he would've gotten a cut of PPV -- leaving half for Floyd plus the $30m or so in gate and foreign rights.
As for the "fight for free" offer, Mayweather did respond. He says he doesn't fight for free. The end.
Is he a noble guy who fights for the fans or is he the guy who should be business first by turning that fight down? (Anytime my a**...) You seem to waver irrationally between the two.
If he really, truly was willing to fight for free, why not fight Mayweather for more than he would see in two fights?
It is what it is. Name calling doesn't change the facts, my man. It only strengthens my point.
get over it.
pacquiao said that HE'LL fight for free, not mayweather, nice try though.
You mad bro?
Comment