Comments Thread For: Photos: Golovkin, Rubio Have First Face To Face!

[dray435]

He's not embarrssing himself, you are. You keep backtracking on what you'd just said, are consistently wrong and clueless

I haven't back tracked once I've proven everything that I said and you are at least twice as ****** as he is so what you say carries even less weight. Not once have I back tracked you both have tried to put words in my mouth but that cannot be considered back tracking. Let me reiterate I never said that the fight was a robbery I said the fight was viewed by many as a robbery. The fight took place in the monroes city and in his back yard but yet it was still close, anyone with some basic common sense and knowledge of boxing knows anytime the fight is viewed as close but in the opponents backyard that normally means the the visiting fighter won, that would explain why some viewed it as a robbery.

Do you honestly think the hometown judges will admit the visiting fighter won or even score it for the visiting fighter even if it was close? Of course you don't. Read what wikipedia says, you two are like little spoiled kids who throw fits when you have been exposed as being pathetically ignorant and dont get your way and you have obviously bought into that ****** theory that the younger generation is smarter which is a bunch of bs promoted by groups with dubious agendas to keep ****** kids like yourselves ******. And based on what Im seeing and reading they are doing an excellent job. You both have been owned and exposed as ignorant and simple minded get over it and get on with your lives.

[HeroBando]

I haven't back tracked once I've proven everything that I said and you are at least twice as ****** as he is so what you say carries even less weight. Not once have I back tracked you both have tried to put words in my mouth but that cannot be considered back tracking. Let me reiterate I never said that the fight was a robbery I said the fight was viewed by many as a robbery. The fight took place in the monroes city and in his back yard but yet it was still close, anyone with some basic common sense and knowledge of boxing knows anytime the fight is viewed as close but in the opponents backyard that normally means the the visiting fighter won, that would explain why some viewed it as a robbery.

Do you honestly think the hometown judges will admit the visiting fighter won or even score it for the visiting fighter even if it was close? Of course you don't. Read what wikipedia says, you two are like little spoiled kids who throw fits when you have been exposed as being pathetically ignorant and dont get your way and you have obviously bought into that ****** theory that the younger generation is smarter which is a bunch of bs promoted by groups with dubious agendas to keep ****** kids like yourselves ******. And based on what Im seeing and reading they are doing an excellent job. You both have been owned and exposed as ignorant and simple minded get over it and get on with your lives.

You said many saw it as a robbery, then tried to backtrack TWICE:

1. First claimed that you never mentioned robbery, which you did like half hour prior
2. Then claimed many saw it as a close fight that could go either way. Thats not a robbery, ******

But thats not all, claimed ATGs dominate every time out then backtracked on that. Youre useless except for comedy value