Title Belts and one champion per weight class??

[djcomplex]

If you could choose one world title to be the one world championship what belt would it be??

Ive noticed that the WBC title ''seems'' to be the most prestigious belt and the IBF seem to be the least corrupt and lets the number one contender get a shot at there belt.

its frustrating that we live in one world and have 4/5 world titles

should be one champion one king.

[The Big Dunn]

wbc and wba are older so they IMO are more respected. I remember when the IBF was formed. I could do without it myself.

WBO IMO is like the IBA/IBC/WBF-all garbage and set up just to get promoters fighters "world" titles.

The above stated-its the quality of the fighter that makes the belts (even the belts I think are garbage ) legitimate.

[djcomplex]

wbc and wba are older so they IMO are more respected. I remember when the IBF was formed. I could do without it myself.

WBO IMO is like the IBA/IBC/WBF-all garbage and set up just to get promoters fighters "world" titles.

The above stated-its the quality of the fighter that makes the belts (even the belts I think are garbage ) legitimate.

thats what i was thinking that the wbo belt is a paper title

[Divine Hammer]

BKB world champion belt

[djcomplex]

BKB world champion belt

[Divine Hammer]

laugh and scoff all you want, but BKB is the future. they've eliminated all those useless belts and focused on ONE champion per weightclass.

imo the BKB belt is the true belt.

[ИATAS]

Doesn't matter which one of the corrupt ****tards you keep, so long as there is only one.

Personally I think the answer is adding more belts and more weight classes. A title per pound I say. That way if a fighter gradually moves up from 130 to 150 they could be a 20 division champion. GOAT

[The Big Dunn]

thats what i was thinking that the wbo belt is a paper title

In a perfect world, every weight class would have

1 world champ
1 us champ or north american champ
1 Mexican or central American champ
1 European champ
1 African champ
1 Asian/pan pacific champ
1 south American champ

[Divine Hammer]

wbc and wba are older so they IMO are more respected. I remember when the IBF was formed. I could do without it myself.

WBO IMO is like the IBA/IBC/WBF-all garbage and set up just to get promoters fighters "world" titles.

The above stated-its the quality of the fighter that makes the belts (even the belts I think are garbage ) legitimate.

just because they're older doesn't mean they're good or acceptable.

you say WBO is bad but at least WBO isn't having super and regular champs on top of the interims hahahahahaha.

and WBC is EXTREMELY corrupt with their giveaway belts (canelo vs hatton, mares vs morel, manny pacquiao vs margarito etc.) and silver, platnium, titanium, magnesium, iron, etc. belts.

if you want to look at a true and pure belt look at he BKB belt. end of story.

[Resilient]

2 Fooking belts max... Doesn't really matter but the WBC title is the most known so I suppose it should be that and the WBA.