Title Belts and one champion per weight class??

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • djcomplex
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • May 2014
    • 245
    • 15
    • 19
    • 7,042

    #1

    Title Belts and one champion per weight class??

    If you could choose one world title to be the one world championship what belt would it be??

    Ive noticed that the WBC title ''seems'' to be the most prestigious belt and the IBF seem to be the least corrupt and lets the number one contender get a shot at there belt.

    its frustrating that we live in one world and have 4/5 world titles

    should be one champion one king.
    27
    WBC
    48.15%
    13
    WBA
    7.41%
    2
    IBF
    37.04%
    10
    WBO
    7.41%
    2

    The poll is expired.

  • The Big Dunn
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2009
    • 70092
    • 9,866
    • 8,167
    • 287,568

    #2
    wbc and wba are older so they IMO are more respected. I remember when the IBF was formed. I could do without it myself.

    WBO IMO is like the IBA/IBC/WBF-all garbage and set up just to get promoters fighters "world" titles.

    The above stated-its the quality of the fighter that makes the belts (even the belts I think are garbage ) legitimate.

    Comment

    • djcomplex
      Contender
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • May 2014
      • 245
      • 15
      • 19
      • 7,042

      #3
      Originally posted by The Big Dunn
      wbc and wba are older so they IMO are more respected. I remember when the IBF was formed. I could do without it myself.

      WBO IMO is like the IBA/IBC/WBF-all garbage and set up just to get promoters fighters "world" titles.

      The above stated-its the quality of the fighter that makes the belts (even the belts I think are garbage ) legitimate.
      thats what i was thinking that the wbo belt is a paper title

      Comment

      • Divine Hammer
        Banned
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Mar 2013
        • 7661
        • 376
        • 4
        • 37,824

        #4
        BKB world champion belt

        Comment

        • djcomplex
          Contender
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • May 2014
          • 245
          • 15
          • 19
          • 7,042

          #5
          Originally posted by Divine Hammer
          BKB world champion belt

          Comment

          • Divine Hammer
            Banned
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Mar 2013
            • 7661
            • 376
            • 4
            • 37,824

            #6
            Originally posted by djcomplex
            laugh and scoff all you want, but BKB is the future. they've eliminated all those useless belts and focused on ONE champion per weightclass.

            imo the BKB belt is the true belt.

            Comment

            • ИATAS
              Banned
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jul 2007
              • 36648
              • 2,509
              • 1,953
              • 50,835

              #7
              Doesn't matter which one of the corrupt ****tards you keep, so long as there is only one.

              Personally I think the answer is adding more belts and more weight classes. A title per pound I say. That way if a fighter gradually moves up from 130 to 150 they could be a 20 division champion. GOAT
              Last edited by ИATAS; 08-20-2014, 11:43 AM.

              Comment

              • The Big Dunn
                Undisputed Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Sep 2009
                • 70092
                • 9,866
                • 8,167
                • 287,568

                #8
                Originally posted by djcomplex
                thats what i was thinking that the wbo belt is a paper title
                In a perfect world, every weight class would have

                1 world champ
                1 us champ or north american champ
                1 Mexican or central American champ
                1 European champ
                1 African champ
                1 Asian/pan pacific champ
                1 south American champ

                Comment

                • Divine Hammer
                  Banned
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Mar 2013
                  • 7661
                  • 376
                  • 4
                  • 37,824

                  #9
                  Originally posted by The Big Dunn
                  wbc and wba are older so they IMO are more respected. I remember when the IBF was formed. I could do without it myself.

                  WBO IMO is like the IBA/IBC/WBF-all garbage and set up just to get promoters fighters "world" titles.

                  The above stated-its the quality of the fighter that makes the belts (even the belts I think are garbage ) legitimate.
                  just because they're older doesn't mean they're good or acceptable.

                  you say WBO is bad but at least WBO isn't having super and regular champs on top of the interims hahahahahaha.

                  and WBC is EXTREMELY corrupt with their giveaway belts (canelo vs hatton, mares vs morel, manny pacquiao vs margarito etc.) and silver, platnium, titanium, magnesium, iron, etc. belts.

                  if you want to look at a true and pure belt look at he BKB belt. end of story.
                  Last edited by Divine Hammer; 08-20-2014, 11:50 AM.

                  Comment

                  • Resilient
                    Banned
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Apr 2014
                    • 2888
                    • 175
                    • 123
                    • 3,263

                    #10
                    2 Fooking belts max... Doesn't really matter but the WBC title is the most known so I suppose it should be that and the WBA.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP