Comments Thread For: Kell Brook: I Proved To Critics That I Belong at Top Level
Collapse
-
-
It looked like he had the potential to be good before, but he had never really proven it.
Brook earned respect with that win.Comment
-
Maybe I wasn't clear. The comparison I was making is: stocky, muscular, quick fighters who look very impressive but fail to convert their mass to tangible power. Bradley's more skilled, but not amazingly so. He came unstuck against a far less skilled Provodnikov, and looked terrible against Pac last time around. Bradley's faster and more accurate than Porter but don't confuse speed with skill. Bradley's a step up, nothing more.Comment
-
Comment
-
Kell Brook, please...
Kell has not fought or defeated any elite fighters. Porter who? Fight Keith "One Time" Thurman. Then maybe.Comment
-
What makes Thurman an 'elite' fighter.
Brook's win over Porter is 10x better than any of Thurman's wins so if he hasn't beat anyone elite, what has Thurman done to be considered elite?Comment
-
Comment
-
He's got a lot of potential but Thurman's untested. He's certainly not elite. You're just buying into the same myth that surrounded Porter until last weekend.Comment
-
Jesus Chavez vs Thurman was exciting, Porter vs Brooks was boring,
and no, Thurman isn't elite yet, on his way, as for Brooks I'm keeping an eye also, we'll see, so far pretty good,Comment
Comment