Originally posted by hitking
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Kovalev-Caparello Early Fight Results
Collapse
-
Originally posted by HEND View PostAmazing how some people read so much into knockouts mostly against tomato cans and at maximum B level fighters...
Rusian himself being a B leveled boxer who's been fighting punching bags off the streets.
Easy work to Legendary.
Comment
-
Lol that interview after the fight Hopkins to Kellerman you lost this interview hahaha....Kovalov is very strong but he has flaws and i believe the executioner Bernard Hopkins will expose them....tuff tuff fight it'll be war can't wait.....
Comment
-
Originally posted by Levity View PostCampillo and Cleverly were top 5 when Kovalev knocked them out, and he's easily wrecked solid fighters like Agnew and Sillakh. Besides, all but one of Hopkins' recent wins at 175 are against the types of opponents you're describing.
How good a fighter is isn't determined by their resume anyway.Last edited by HEND; 08-02-2014, 10:41 PM.
Comment
-
It appears that HBO with the help of the Duva's and Arum are trying to cripple boxing with these pathetic match-ups.
Comment
-
Originally posted by HEND View PostThey arein another league, even the 50 years old Hopkins will beat easily this hypejob. But I already spoke about it with King and we've made a bet too. If Kovalev somehow (except robbery) beat Hopkins I'll give him credit but now he looks like a hypejob for me who will easily exposed by Hopkins.
I disagree that Kovalev is overhyped but we'll see.
Comment
-
If Bhop fight the Krusher the way he fought his last several fights then he gets stopped. Kovalev doesn't just stop his opponents he beats the living hell out of them something Bernard doesn't or can't do.8th rd KO.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Levity View PostKovalev is in another league than Shumenov (see his fights with Campillo) and Murat (see his fight with Cleverly) are, and as I said resumes don't = ability anyway.
I disagree that Kovalev is overhyped but we'll see.
Comment
Comment