GGG article in The New Yorker

[FiercePierce]

I totally disagree with this article saying GGG is not near as technical as Tyson...I believe its the other way around...GGG is way more technical and precise as Tyson...Tyson did move his head better but GGG has his defensive subtle tricks...Tyson threw way more wildly on offense while GGG is usually patient and precise...he went 345-5 in the amatuers where u need to be super technical to win...and GGG dont ever smile when he gets hit...he nods his head that he got hit but never smiles...once GGG puts the gloves on to when the fight is over its all serious business and never a smile on him...he gets the terminator look....silly article

[R_Walken]

Jay Caspian Kang always deliver good boxing related articles. ( Broner, Canelo, Din King were all top shelf )

[JaguaresMx]

NSB: where The New Yorker is a crap poorly written magazine.

[Outwest Exp 355]

GGG has had enough cream puffs. Now Geale was a solid win and let's see if he can build off that.