Tweet
As a fight fan, would you rather have one, dominant kingpin who reigns for a generation in his weight class OR a weight class that is constantly competitive with the belt holder changing every year?
-
-
Either..
If your gonna dominant then you better destroy guys like Tyson, ggg, kovolev.. If it's competitive then it better be like jmm-manny, morales-Barrera, Holyfield-bowe..
Can't go wrong either way -
Both but in a competitive weight division I'd prefer for the skill level to be as high as possible unlike today's crusierweight division for example.Comment
-
The ideal would be a dominant champion who is challenged by opponents who beat everyone else in the division, building up to a big showdown and passing of the torch.
But as we know that's rarely the case. The dominant champion becomes a huge paycheck so everyone wants to minimize their odds of losing before fighting him, sits around fighting bums and and waits to get the big phonecall.
For that reason I prefer chaotic, up-for-grabs divisions.Comment
-
The point of boxing is to win and be dominate...Comment
-
If it's my favorite fighter, I like to see dominance. Otherwise give me a back and forth match.Comment
-
ongoing competitiveness, but I'm always more impressed when one person is just THAT much more dominant. Rigo vs Donaire for example.Comment
-
Depends. I enjoy brilliant one sided boxing performances, 1 sided destructions and competitive back and forth fights.
The only fights I can't watch is when one guy clearly shows up just to collect a check and stops trying to win.Comment
Comment