Peter Quillin has an equal, if not better resume than Gennady Golovkin

[Citizen Koba]

Reading some of these posts, I think people are confusing who is better with their resumes..

Their resumes and level of competition is very similar, the only difference is ggg dominates and is a better fighter.. But in terms of actual resume, they are about the same

Yeah. Resumes perhaps just edge to GGG - though a win over Geale would tip it firmly in GGGs favour.

In terms of the manner of victory and who is the better fighter I think there's very few who doubt that Golovkin is the better fighter.

[therealpugilist]

This poll illustrates that most the people on hear cant support their feelings


this poll is very one sided and reflects most on this forum dont know **** about boxing.


Golovkin and Quillin have fought similar competition their really is no dispute


Whats the point of doing a poll when no matter if its a lie or truth, fan boys will vote for their guy


Ya'll know damn well GGG resume is no better than Quillin...GGG is the supposed number one contender and several guys have fought and beat better comp.....Geale, Cotto, Sturm, Martinez, etc.

[Sir Babatunde]

This poll illustrates that most the people on hear cant support their feelings


this poll is very one sided and reflects most on this forum dont know **** about boxing.


Golovkin and Quillin have fought similar competition their really is no dispute


Whats the point of doing a poll when no matter if its a lie or truth, fan boys will vote for their guy


Ya'll know damn well GGG resume is no better than Quillin...GGG is the supposed number one contender and several guys have fought and beat better comp.....Geale, Cotto, Sturm, Martinez, etc.

[bojangles1987]

This poll illustrates that most the people on hear cant support their feelings


this poll is very one sided and reflects most on this forum dont know **** about boxing.


Golovkin and Quillin have fought similar competition their really is no dispute


Whats the point of doing a poll when no matter if its a lie or truth, fan boys will vote for their guy


Ya'll know damn well GGG resume is no better than Quillin...GGG is the supposed number one contender and several guys have fought and beat better comp.....Geale, Cotto, Sturm, Martinez, etc.

If they've fought similar competition but one fighter both has the best individual win AND has beaten that similar competition more impressively, how are their resumes the same? It doesn't make sense.

[RAV3N]

I think that Macklin is probably the only difference in the resumes but if GGG beats Geale this weekend then there will be no question as to who has the better one.

GGG was much more impressive in beating his opponents as compared to Quillin.

[From Russia]

and beats their asses...while Quillin struggles

Well, Quillin struggles because he himself is a tomato can. Two tomato cans = even fight

[Russian Crushin]

Yea but quillin inspires and has so many fans that support him, not to mention a GED

[From Russia]

Well dang Black America is mad

GGG coming for all dem slick brothas

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Why are people hyping up Macklin so much as a good win?

[.:: JSFD26 ::.]

This poll illustrates that most the people on hear cant support their feelings


this poll is very one sided and reflects most on this forum dont know **** about boxing.


Golovkin and Quillin have fought similar competition their really is no dispute


Whats the point of doing a poll when no matter if its a lie or truth, fan boys will vote for their guy


Ya'll know damn well GGG resume is no better than Quillin...GGG is the supposed number one contender and several guys have fought and beat better comp.....Geale, Cotto, Sturm, Martinez, etc.

They are voting GGG based on pure fanboyism and cause he "destroyed" his opposition. But that doesnt chanhe the fact that they both have fought **** opposition.

Oh and in their heads they're thinking, well if GGG wasnt avoided he would have a better resume. So they vote GGG for that reason as well.