Official Tyson Fury vs Wladimir Klitschko Post Fight Discussion Thread

[Jewish-Reptile]

I think he will stop the champ, not a one punch KO but the ref will wave it off after Fury unleashes a late barrage on the exhausted Wlad, with the champ unable to defend himself.

Fury-Chisora II wasn't an anti climax, anyone who knows boring will appreciate the masterclass that Fury put on.

Ok. Right I love watching Klitschko for putting on his clinics so I can appreciate the Fury vs Chisora 2 fight for its worth as you suggest, i cant say i was excited. The double standards of calling Klitschko boring and Fury exciting is truly laughable though.

[Jewish-Reptile]

If Klitschko completely walks through Fury, then it'll show how underrated Jennings truly is and that Klitschko is not yet showing age

I think their was a lot or apprehension and nervous energy burnt by Klitschko on his return to NY, with the strict refereeing and unfamiliarity boxing away from hme for the first time in 7 years was it ?

Jennings was using he same bull rushing tactics as Povetkin trying to come in under the guard, Banks issued his frustrations with the tactics justifying why Klitschko had to use the tactics he did. Folk will say he has no infighting game which is of course nonsense, that crushing left hook is the best left hook in boxing.

[LoadedWraps]

Ok. Right I love watching Klitschko for putting on his clinics so I can appreciate the Fury vs Chisora 2 fight for its worth as you suggest, i cant say i was excited. The double standards of calling Klitschko boring and Fury exciting is truly laughable though.

How? One is an exciting, highly skilled, volume punching monster with a come forward, crowd pleasing style, the other is a skill boxer who switches between hiding behind the jab, and clinching for 99.5% of the fight.

Not double standards at all, if there were double standards in that statement, both would have the same style and fight the same way.

[Jewish-Reptile]

um, what does the oppoent have to do with the point of the article? Did you even read it? It's about what Fury does right in the ring and subtlties in his game, the person he was fighting in the video is irrelevant. A fighter doesn't need to be in the ring with an elite opponent to use the video to take positive things the fighter in question is doing, ya numpty.

After the first or second paragraph it's clearly a very biased read, did he read it yes, all the way through ? Unlikely. The opponent in question is a nobody, Hammer was knocked out by Wach, whom just about every Klitschko detractor in this thread claims is a cement footed bum, the same Hammer Fury could not knock out.

[Jewish-Reptile]

How? One is an exciting, highly skilled, volume punching monster with a come forward, crowd pleasing style, the other is a skill boxer who switches between hiding behind the jab, and clinching for 99.5% of the fight.

Not double standards at all, if there were double standards in that statement, both would have the same style and fight the same way.

Define crowd pleasing and exciting please, just to clarify we are talking about the same Tyson Fury who was booed by fans against Chisora and fans walked out before the end right, their is not two of these goofs is their ?

Klitschko is claimed to be a boring jab jab hold champion by Fury is he not ? I'm sure he said something to the effect their isn't anybody in Europe who does not want to see him knock Klitschko out because he's boring etc, when I saw Fury in his last two fights he fought no differently in regards to the jab and clinch when his opponent got inside, his own smother tactics are quite impressive the way he ties his opponents arms up with his gangly arms is impressive too.

Double standards, hypocrites it's all the same. Klitschko has perfected it and you guys bemoan it. Fact is if the guy talked smack, made a fool out of himself like Fury does, cursed, cussed and/or held a British passport you'd all offer to suck his d.ick off.

[STEELHEAD]

Wlad ain't walking through Fury. He doesn't walk through anyone.


Jennings is not underrated , he's overrated.

He has no amateur backround and it shows. His skills are raw and under developed. He's learning on the job.

At this level he is still unable to turn his jab out to maximise his reach advantage.
He should have a Liston type jab - instead he has no jab at all.

His reach advantage which is one of his best assets actually hampers him. Can't turn his shots over and can't shorten them up to **** on the inside.
Thats is why he is a pillow puff puncher with a low KO %.

very much agree

[Elroy1]

Of course Fury has a good chance in this fight! It's boxing and he's going up against an unbeaten 6'9" 260lber with unusual attributes for a guy that size.

But come on He's a clear underdog.

I have to take my hat off to the Fury fans here.

They have sold this fight for Fury better than any other Klitschko victim I have ever seen yet!!

Kudo's!

But it's nothing more than spin and hype and trashtalk.

Klitschko.

You would be a bit silly to bet on any other outcome!

[yoz]

How? One is an exciting, highly skilled, volume punching monster with a come forward, crowd pleasing style, the other is a skill boxer who switches between hiding behind the jab, and clinching for 99.5% of the fight.

Not double standards at all, if there were double standards in that statement, both would have the same style and fight the same way.

One feasts on blown-up cruiserweights and feather-fisted opposition (and still gets dropped...); the other fights all-comers, and is the heavyweight champion of the world.

[yoz]

A soon as Wladimir lands a straight right or left hook (or, maybe, even a stiff jab, given Fury's punch resistance), it's goodnight.

[Fury4daWIN]

Helenius had reportedly a shoulder issue going in and damaged his knuckles as early as the second round, if memory serves yet still won, Chisora wasn't at all that impressive. As he wasn't versus Vitali either yet it is another popular myth he had another 'impressive loss'. Against Scott I had him down by three rounds, not only was the knockdown illagitimate the stoppage stank worse than any other in recent memory.

What a pack of lies. Helenius didn't win squat. It was a blatant and obvious robbery which only you seem prepared to support since the alternative would be to accept that Chisora isn't as terrible as you are determined to make out.

The Vitali fight's almost as big a joke. Remember how it was meant to be this epic beatdown after all the disgusting stunts Chisora performed in the build up (spitting in Wlad's face, slapping Vitali etc)? Everyone and their aunt were predicting pain. Instead Vitali gets forced to run around the ring for twelve rounds and has to settle for a close points decision. Yeah, he really showed him, didn't he?

As for the Scott fight, you say the stoppage stank worse than any in recent memory? Only if you have the memory of a gibbering imbecile, maybe. Scott Wilder ring any bells? Now that was fishy.