Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Arum: Pacquiao-Algieri Being Finalized, Manny Likes It

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by megadeth View Post
    And really? All Floyd? So building a stadium is "all Floyd"? Waiting for the cut to heal is "all Floyd"? May is too early", only to change once Floyd is sentenced is "all Floyd"? Pac hanging up and not negotiating is "all Floyd"? More fanboyism from you I see!
    well if floyd didnt do any of that, pac sure didnt either. LOL!!! so prove me wrong.

    Comment


    • What a crap fight. I actually think Algieri is a good fighter with potential, but he needs to do more work before being thrown into a PPV with Manny Pacquiao.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Evol View Post
        how am i defending pac again? if pac think he's getting a good deal then who are u to say he's not? so by me saying that, im defending him? are u seriously getting mad over this? LOL!! show me where i called floyd out on and didnt call pac on? are u talking about this match up? since u were looking at my post history then u would have seen the post from me regarding this crap match up! LOL! so try again. and the things u listed on ur previous post, manny really didnt say that! if he did prove me wrong then. i'll wait.... u cant just make up things to fit ur agenda then gets mad at others.


        Are you kidding. Again, you called Floyd out on being a coward and ducking Pacquiao for years.....and didn't call Pac out. FINALLY after Roach himself admitting it was their fault you still needed a long debate to admit that Pac was at faultfor the first negotiations. There you go!

        Your right, he didn't say those things. The guy he PAYS to promote his fight and speak for him did. You certainly didn't see him disavowing those statements now did u??

        Comment


        • Originally posted by megadeth View Post
          Are you kidding. Again, you called Floyd out on being a coward and ducking Pacquiao for years.....and didn't call Pac out. FINALLY after Roach himself admitting it was their fault you still needed a long debate to admit that Pac was at faultfor the first negotiations. There you go!

          Your right, he didn't say those things. The guy he PAYS to promote his fight and speak for him did. You certainly didn't see him disavowing those statements now did u??
          did u missed my previous post? what did roach said after that part? he said anything else after the first negotiation was on floyd. and how did debating about pac's resigning with TR turn into what roach said, pac vs floyd negotiation? LOL!!! this is why u're a fan boy! u're bringing up shiiet that wasnt even brought up in the original debate! manny is such a coward, he coward out during the first negotiation. are u happy now lil boy?

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Evol View Post
            did u missed my previous post? what did roach said after that part? he said anything else after the first negotiation was on floyd. and how did debating about pac's resigning with TR turn into what roach said, pac vs floyd negotiation? LOL!!! this is why u're a fan boy! u're bringing up shiiet that wasnt even brought up in the original debate! manny is such a coward, he coward out during the first negotiation. are u happy now lil boy?
            Did did u miss mine? The debate was about THE FIRST negotiations. How difficult is that to understand. You wouldn't even admit it even after he said that. So why do u keep bringing up what he said after that, when we weren't talking about that? Roach can say that too, but my previous post with all the excuses proved that wrong too. So, because I brought something up, to prove how bias you are, that makes me the fanboy? Your logic is purely ******ed! Nope...not happy cuz I wouldn't say either of them are cowards. Any man who steps in the ring can't be a coward, but if u are gonna be here and debate, call a spade a spade. And if 2 fighter do the exact same thing, then call it as it is. That's so difficult?

            Comment


            • Originally posted by megadeth View Post
              Did did u miss mine? The debate was about THE FIRST negotiations. How difficult is that to understand. You wouldn't even admit it even after he said that. So why do u keep bringing up what he said after that, when we weren't talking about that? Roach can say that too, but my previous post with all the excuses proved that wrong too. So, because I brought something up, to prove how bias you are, that makes me the fanboy? Your logic is purely ******ed! Nope...not happy cuz I wouldn't say either of them are cowards. Any man who steps in the ring can't be a coward, but if u are gonna be here and debate, call a spade a spade. And if 2 fighter do the exact same thing, then call it as it is. That's so difficult?
              no try again. this is what u posted, and this is what i quoted u with. so how did this turn into pac vs floyd negotiation and what roach said? LOL!!! and i cant even admit to what roach said? are u ******ed? i just said in my previous post, roach said anything after the 1st negotiation was on floyd's part. if i was trying to defend that i would have said roach never said any of that. heres the original debate

              Originally posted by megadeth View Post
              There were so many that were defending Pac for resigning with Arum, rather than become a free agent or accessing his value with other promoters, saying it was a smart move. Is there anyone that still defends this move?
              Originally posted by Evol View Post
              lets see, easy fight = big reward. yeah pac made a bad decision staying with TR right. LOL!!! whats with people on here and asking pac to become a free agent?? why not lets just ask all the boxers to become a free agent then?

              Comment


              • Originally posted by megadeth View Post
                Did did u miss mine? The debate was about THE FIRST negotiations. How difficult is that to understand. You wouldn't even admit it even after he said that. So why do u keep bringing up what he said after that, when we weren't talking about that? Roach can say that too, but my previous post with all the excuses proved that wrong too. So, because I brought something up, to prove how bias you are, that makes me the fanboy? Your logic is purely ******ed! Nope...not happy cuz I wouldn't say either of them are cowards. Any man who steps in the ring can't be a coward, but if u are gonna be here and debate, call a spade a spade. And if 2 fighter do the exact same thing, then call it as it is. That's so difficult?
                MEGADEATH FOR PRESIDENT of the Phillippines! Don't forget the cuts and stadiums were in the second negotiations. The blood test was in the first negotiations! Give 'em hell!

                Comment


                • Originally posted by _original_ View Post
                  What a crap fight. I actually think Algieri is a good fighter with potential, but he needs to do more work before being thrown into a PPV with Manny Pacquiao.
                  The guy fought only one 12 rounder up to now... He's also supposed to move North at 147, right?
                  This fight isn't serious staff...

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Evol View Post
                    no try again. this is what u posted, and this is what i quoted u with. so how did this turn into pac vs floyd negotiation and what roach said? LOL!!! and i cant even admit to what roach said? are u ******ed? i just said in my previous post, roach said anything after the 1st negotiation was on floyd's part. if i was trying to defend that i would have said roach never said any of that. heres the original debate
                    How can you speak slower when typing??

                    Maybe u missed that part where I told u we debated previously...this was weeks ago when the video came out. Today I said I brought it up, because I was showing you how BIAS you are. That you couldn't even admit, even after Roach admitted it, that the FIRST NEGOTIATIONS was Pac's fault. THAT is how it came up.

                    You only admitted it, after a long debate.....AFTER Roach had admitted it. GET IT? Meaning, you STILL NEEDED CONVINCING EVEN AFTER PACS OWN TRAINER ADMITTED IT! How hard is that to comprehend? The only thing u want to keep mentioning is what Roach said AFTER the first negotiation, but when we debated this previously, it was not about that!

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Bronx2245 View Post
                      MEGADEATH FOR PRESIDENT of the Phillippines! Don't forget the cuts and stadiums were in the second negotiations. The blood test was in the first negotiations! Give 'em hell!
                      Thats the point I'm trying to get across. Roach admitted the first negotiation was their fault and Evol say that after that it was all Floyds fault. That's why I brought those things up. To show him, obviously it wasn't. His response :Well, Pac didn't say those things! And at the same time defending Pac re-signing with Arum. Either Pac stays with Arum and takes responsibility for things that Arum or does in his name, shuts him up or gets away from him. You can't stay with him and then expect not to be blamed too when excuses like those come up and you don't even come out against them.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP