Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

NSAC Scrutinizes Levi Martinez

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    that was a terrible scorecard from levi. he is either blind or very corrupt.

    7-5 Lara.

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by Mr.Fantastic View Post
      I had it 8-4 Canelo...his score wasn't as bad as people make it out to be. Maybe in the close rounds, he gave it to the aggressor more often.

      Plus he's scored other fights really well.
      no way canelo won 8 rounds or more. you're almost levi martinez bad when it comes to scoring and you seem okay with that which is also shocking.

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by Slyboots View Post
        It took 1 fight and a iffy scorecard for this guy to be scrutinized yet CJ Ross had a history of even worse scorecards and never received any scrutiny.

        Good on the NAC I suppose but I wish they were a bit more consistent with this type of thing.
        The commission are run by new people now. Dana White (UFC president) keeps bringing up how awesome the management changes at the commission have been lately. This must be why theyve gotten things together a bit more now, even in boxing.

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by PBP View Post
          Everybody that scores a loss for Lara seems to end up suspended. Lol
          lol Lara's got some interesting luck. It seems he's rarely ever in a fight without some form of controversy.

          Comment


          • #25
            Laugh out loud at the Paulie bots in this thread. Most had it 7-5 Canelo and you can easily say 7-5 to Lara was just as bad.

            Comment


            • #26
              He shouldnt be allowed to judge distance let alone a fight. He was incompetent either way. If he was being corrupt he was incompetent because he made it so obvious, but if not then he was just being incompetent incompetent.

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by DannYankee09 View Post
                He shouldnt be allowed to judge distance let alone a fight.
                Sucks, 'cause a competent judge might've given Lara the needed vote for victory.

                Comment


                • #28
                  All of the sudden literally the next day official probes are being launched. What a production.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Boxing has no commissioner to oversee the sport so what can they do? The promoters and networks are putting on the show, they hire the judges. The state athletic committee's can only do so much.
                    That 117-111 card was some BS, but doesn't change the fact who won the fight. Canelo deserved the close victory. Lara fans, all 10 of them, can argue about the scores but their guy deserved the loss with that performance.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by Mr.Fantastic View Post
                      How bout you be the judge of many fights, you're NEVER going to have a 100% accuracy. I don't care how good of a judge you can be.
                      Do you really want me to go thru his BoxRec and post all his scores? Its not about messing up the scores. Is it a coincidence that he gave Lomachenko the fight plus Canelo and Broner some scores wider than they shouldve been?
                      Originally posted by PBP View Post
                      And Broner 100 Molina 90

                      Dude is garbage. Nice to see the NSAC out him like this
                      I can easily bring up others. I couldnt bother. Not worth my time. People know who this guy is and what hes been up to.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP