-
-
That video and the people in it are literally clueless about boxing. A typical bunch of tools talking like they are experts on a subject which they clearly have no clue about.
It opens with a guy arguing that Mike Tyson beats George Foreman, because "Foreman got no jab. No jab. He don't have a jab at all'
Really?
It's like one of those NSB conversations in which guys just make up random facts as they go along to suit whatever crap they're trying to argue. They've seen some highlights of Foreman knocking guys out, and he's known as a big slugger, so they form the opinion that he's just a power puncher and that guys with good jabs have to fight like Ali, Holmes and Lewis, therefore they know for a certainty now that Foreman 'has no jab, he got no jab, no jab at all'
George Foreman couldn't jab? Ya could have fooled me. I'd always been of the opinion that he had one of the hardest heavyweight jabs in history and that's a very standard view. Not only was it like someone else's straight right, it was also educated is well timed, straight and sneaky. He has one of those jabs that everyone calls underrated, yet everyone but a few dim bulbs knows how good it was.Comment
Tweet
Comment