anyone know what gamboa rehydration weight was

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • DannYankee
    Evil Empire
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Oct 2008
    • 7066
    • 338
    • 207
    • 17,249

    #11
    Originally posted by f4314n68
    I thought no excuses, I have seen you make nothing but excuses like a b*tch for the last 24 hours. "he need a new trainer doe, he was too small doe, he had a long lay off doe," lol funny thing you were talkin so much ish yesterday and saying if your favorite fighter (gamboa) loses you wont make excuses and give crawford credit. Yet, all you have done is make excuses, you and your ******** boys will be the same july 12th
    Those are facts not excuses you b*tthurt Canelo fan girl. If you where to get Cuban balls of your mouth you could see that, and Crawford himself said the size was an advantage so eat a d*ck , but i never once said the layoff had **** to do with it you little butt plug. He didn't look rusty . Facts are facts an excuse would be me saying he could continue, and won that's an excuse means something that is complete bull**** and a lie... learn the difference if you want me to adopt you there's a limit to how ****** of a son I can have. Gamboa lost to a better bigger man how is that taking away from Crawfords win or excusing Gamboa?

    Thats reality, but you dont live in it I forget, you live tucked in between Canelo's ballsack.
    Last edited by DannYankee; 06-29-2014, 09:25 PM.

    Comment

    • FrankieClutch
      OTSC
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • May 2009
      • 6084
      • 177
      • 396
      • 26,671

      #12
      Originally posted by SlySlickSmooth
      5'5 1/2" according to box rec

      Crawford is 5'8"
      He looks much shorter than that lol

      Comment

      • DannYankee
        Evil Empire
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Oct 2008
        • 7066
        • 338
        • 207
        • 17,249

        #13
        Originally posted by FrankieClutch
        He looks much shorter than that lol
        Gamboa is 5'5 that is right, but I think Crawford is just taller than 5'8 ricky burns was listed as 5'10 and Crawford was a tad taller than him. Crawford can go to 140 and 147 after if he wishes he has the size and skill for it.

        Comment

        • CatchAndShoot
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Feb 2014
          • 3534
          • 257
          • 202
          • 17,533

          #14
          Originally posted by FrankieClutch
          He looks much shorter than that lol
          It's the arm length. Make you look longer. Pernell is around the same height, but his arms are 4" longer.

          Comment

          • !! Shawn
            !! Shown
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Dec 2007
            • 9810
            • 670
            • 724
            • 31,455

            #15
            Originally posted by mathed
            Sure Crawford was the bigger guy but had Crawford not switched up his style, would he have won the fight? I am not so sure he would have. I think more credit should be given to Crawford's versatility than his size advantage honestly. He switched it up southpaw, started going to the body, slipped to his right away from Gamboa's power hand and used distance with the jab.
            Let be real, Crawford wasn't able to slip anything until Gamboa started to tire.

            Comment

            • Bardock
              The Champ
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Apr 2013
              • 6462
              • 440
              • 965
              • 14,357

              #16
              Originally posted by mathed
              Sure Crawford was the bigger guy but had Crawford not switched up his style, would he have won the fight? I am not so sure he would have. I think more credit should be given to Crawford's versatility than his size advantage honestly. He switched it up southpaw, started going to the body, slipped to his right away from Gamboa's power hand and used distance with the jab.
              Exactly, it was TC who made the adjustment after getting thoroughly outclassed and outgunned in his home town for the first 4 rounds. It almost had nothing to do with size, and as you can see, the size didn't matter when Gamboa was tagging TC with that right hand over and over again, but to f4ggot ass fanboys like DannYankee it matters. I can guarantee you 100% if Gamboa would have KO'd him or won you wouldn't hear one single thing about size and power advantage that crawford had. IMHO Gamboa still had more power than TC but TC could take his power and Gamboa having the paper jaw that he has, couldn't take TC's. TC is a future P4P #1, He can box, he can brawl, good footwork, ducks nobody. THIS is what fraud could have been, we'll see the road TC takes.

              Originally posted by DannYankee09
              Those are facts not excuses you b*tthurt Canelo fan girl. If you where to get Cuban balls of your mouth you could see that, and Crawford himself said the size was an advantage so eat a d*ck , but i never once said the layoff had **** to do with it you little butt plug. He didn't look rusty . Facts are facts an excuse would be me saying he could continue, and won that's an excuse means something that is complete bull**** and a lie... learn the difference if you want me to adopt you there's a limit to how ****** of a son I can have. Gamboa lost to a better bigger man how is that taking away from Crawfords win or excusing Gamboa?

              Thats reality, but you dont live in it I forget, you live tucked in between Canelo's ballsack.
              LOLOLOLOL sure. You haven't said one single thing about crawford making the adjustment. I'm sure after the 4th round you were salsa dancing thinking Gamboa was going to KO him :gay:
              Instead of coming out and actually giving crawford credit, all you've said is "he was too big, crawford was stronger and had more power, He can stilll beat mikey!!!" ******

              Comment

              • mathed
                molṑn labé
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Feb 2009
                • 54551
                • 2,743
                • 2,984
                • 224,675

                #17
                Originally posted by !! Shawn
                Let be real, Crawford wasn't able to slip anything until Gamboa started to tire.
                He wasn't able to do much of anything until he switched to southpaw.

                Comment

                • FrankieClutch
                  OTSC
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • May 2009
                  • 6084
                  • 177
                  • 396
                  • 26,671

                  #18
                  Originally posted by CatchAndShoot
                  It's the arm length. Make you look longer. Pernell is around the same height, but his arms are 4" longer.
                  Originally posted by DannYankee09
                  Gamboa is 5'5 that is right, but I think Crawford is just taller than 5'8 ricky burns was listed as 5'10 and Crawford was a tad taller than him. Crawford can go to 140 and 147 after if he wishes he has the size and skill for it.
                  Maybe a combo of his short arms and Crawfords height made him look tiny lol. Either way, 135 is too high for Gamboa. Hopefully he moves down

                  Comment

                  • FrankieClutch
                    OTSC
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • May 2009
                    • 6084
                    • 177
                    • 396
                    • 26,671

                    #19
                    Originally posted by mathed
                    He wasn't able to do much of anything until he switched to southpaw.
                    This, that was a beautiful adjustment by Crawford

                    Comment

                    • DannYankee
                      Evil Empire
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Oct 2008
                      • 7066
                      • 338
                      • 207
                      • 17,249

                      #20
                      Originally posted by f4314n68
                      LOLOLOLOL sure. You haven't said one single thing about crawford making the adjustment. I'm sure after the 4th round you were salsa dancing thinking Gamboa was going to KO him :gay:
                      Instead of coming out and actually giving crawford credit, all you've said is "he was too big, crawford was stronger and had more power, He can stilll beat mikey!!!" ******
                      First of all ou have the blinders on ****** i have said multiple times size was secondary to the main thing that Crawford used to beat Gamboa which was his brain his ring IQ, but you wouldn't know much about that sinze you dont have one .Matter of fact i can quote myself on so many instances including my first post after Gamboa lost giving credit to Crawford you would look ******, but im not gonna waste my time since all your cunty self is doing is licking some Cuban taint getting giddy and jumping the gun too soon when you think you even remotely think have something to hang on to (and have failed miserably every time just look above for an example of said times ppls ).

                      Facts of life Lara is better than Canelo and will win face it go through the stages of grief and you will be a happier nutthugger for it. Remember there is life after Lara you will be ight ill nurse you back to health after your mental breakdown. Oh and Lastly Gamboa can still beat anybody south of 135 believe that unless he is broken after this or some **** remember it.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP