Shawn Porter vs Kell Brook not happening? Info inside

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Grimmer
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jan 2008
    • 4271
    • 300
    • 354
    • 10,636

    #31
    Brook has been a welterweight mandatory for like 5 years now, lol

    Comment

    • OnePunch
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • May 2008
      • 9122
      • 1,307
      • 776
      • 2,453,131

      #32
      heres another thing that could possibly be at play here.......

      This fight didnt go to purse bid because both sides thought they could make a deal. That was before Shaeffer left GBP. It is entirely possible that since Porter is not signed to GBP, and therefore does not have the contract protection of "minimum purses" or any other contract provisions, there could be problems with the negotiations between Porter and GBP.

      Obviously GBP will not take a loss on a fighter they dont promote.

      If thats what this is about, then it will have to go back to purse bid......

      Comment

      • komodo
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jan 2011
        • 2139
        • 687
        • 1,033
        • 9,452

        #33
        This is from an interview with Shawn's dad from 2 weeks ago after the fight was apparently confirmed.

        Porter's father and trainer Ken is hopeful that history doesn't repeat itself and that the fight comes to fruition.

        "You know I am somewhat concerned about that. I just said to somebody the other day that I am concerned that this guy has had situations before and you go through a whole entire camp and he pulls out at the last minute and you can't get a replacement. That is a concern. We need to sign contracts so we can move forward but yes that is a concern," Porter revealed.
        From this and a few other sources it looks like Brook has yet to sign and send off the contract even though the fight was agreed in principle so make what you want from it.

        Comment

        • MBE
          Order of Chivalry
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Sep 2011
          • 1772
          • 106
          • 134
          • 8,505

          #34
          Originally posted by OnePunch
          heres another thing that could possibly be at play here.......

          This fight didnt go to purse bid because both sides thought they could make a deal. That was before Shaeffer left GBP. It is entirely possible that since Porter is not signed to GBP, and therefore does not have the contract protection of "minimum purses" or any other contract provisions, there could be problems with the negotiations between Porter and GBP.

          Obviously GBP will not take a loss on a fighter they dont promote.

          If thats what this is about, then it will have to go back to purse bid......
          This looks to be the most likely situation. Oscar is not going to keep getting out his chequebook for fighters he hasn't signed now shaeffer/Haymon aren't running the show.

          Comment

          • 285Kid
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Jan 2012
            • 7102
            • 91
            • 0
            • 14,777

            #35
            Come on IBF if Brook doesn't fight here remove him from the top 15

            Comment

            • Dirk Diggler UK
              Deleted
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jun 2008
              • 48836
              • 1,312
              • 693
              • 58,902

              #36
              Originally posted by komodo
              This is from an interview with Shawn's dad from 2 weeks ago after the fight was apparently confirmed.



              From this and a few other sources it looks like Brook has yet to sign and send off the contract even though the fight was agreed in principle so make what you want from it.
              Brook has signed the contract

              Comment

              • Money_May
                Banned
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Jun 2011
                • 14683
                • 317
                • 264
                • 22,957

                #37
                People are jumping on brook too soon. This could quite possibly be Porter preventing this from happening.

                Comment

                • TommyToughNuts
                  Banned
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Apr 2014
                  • 616
                  • 48
                  • 14
                  • 8,630

                  #38
                  Brooke is a chicken **** ***** of a fighter who has been protected his entire career. STRIP HIM OF HIS GODDAMN BELT!!

                  Comment

                  • Dirk Diggler UK
                    Deleted
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jun 2008
                    • 48836
                    • 1,312
                    • 693
                    • 58,902

                    #39
                    Originally posted by TommyToughNuts
                    Brooke is a chicken **** ***** of a fighter who has been protected his entire career. STRIP HIM OF HIS GODDAMN BELT!!
                    He doesn't have a belt thicko

                    Comment

                    • TommyToughNuts
                      Banned
                      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                      • Apr 2014
                      • 616
                      • 48
                      • 14
                      • 8,630

                      #40
                      Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
                      He doesn't have a belt thicko

                      Who gives a ****? He's still a protected *****

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP