Solido v Lomenchenko was a horrible robbery.

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • slimshandy69
    I HAVE ***** TATTOO!
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Aug 2009
    • 3642
    • 323
    • 3
    • 16,514

    #1

    Solido v Lomenchenko was a horrible robbery.

    Not only did Lomenchenko win the fight on my score card by 2 rounds, nearly ko-ing solido, also computer box showed lomenchenko outlanding Solido. But the amount of Low blows Solido did should have resulted in disqualification.

    This is on par with Amir khan lemont peterson robbery.
  • DannYankee
    Evil Empire
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Oct 2008
    • 7066
    • 338
    • 207
    • 17,249

    #2
    Originally posted by slimshandy69
    Not only did Lomenchenko win the fight on my score card by 2 rounds, nearly ko-ing solido, also computer box showed lomenchenko outlanding Solido. But the amount of Low blows Solido did should have resulted in disqualification.

    This is on par with Amir khan lemont peterson robbery.
    European fighters are all garbage . Seriously tho get off their d*ck it's past obvious now.

    Comment

    • Derranged
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Oct 2005
      • 46593
      • 2,126
      • 1,350
      • 162,628

      #3
      Salido should have been DQ'd for all those low blows. Lousy refereeing.

      Wasn't a robbery though, Loma didn't do enough and its a fight he shouldn't have been in anyway. A title shot in his second pro fight? Ridiculous .

      And at people excusing Salido's low-blows by bringing up Loma's clinching. Even when clinching is excessive, it takes quite a lot of it to get a point taken away. When someone lands 40 low blows without the ref saying "BOO" about it, there's a big problem.
      Last edited by Derranged; 06-16-2014, 05:19 PM.

      Comment

      • humanpunchingbg
        Contender
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Apr 2013
        • 460
        • 16
        • 9
        • 6,613

        #4
        Lomachenko won like 4 rounds, he didn't let his hands go until like the 8th round and he didn't almost KO salido. He had him hurt.

        Comment

        • BigZigga
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Apr 2012
          • 1359
          • 56
          • 363
          • 8,732

          #5
          We are in the minority, but I agree with TS. Salido wasn't even attempting to land anything other than low blows

          Comment

          • Bigg Rigg
            The People's Champion
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Jan 2013
            • 11387
            • 280
            • 58
            • 20,735

            #6
            I actually agree. Salido should have been penalized for the low blows too. **** him!!

            Comment

            • REMOVE SHARK 55
              Banned
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • May 2013
              • 2296
              • 171
              • 1,019
              • 10,832

              #7
              Punished for low blows yeah I agree but not Loma got his head popped back time and time again


              Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

              Comment

              • joesaiditstrue
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Mar 2008
                • 5271
                • 488
                • 1,449
                • 13,590

                #8
                Originally posted by Derranged
                Salido should have been DQ'd for all those low blows. Lousy refereeing.

                Wasn't a robbery though, Loma didn't do enough and its a fight he shouldn't have been in anyway. A title shot in his second pro fight? Ridiculous .

                And at people excusing Salido's low-blows by bringing up Loma's clinching. Even when clinching is excessive, it takes quite a lot of it to get a point taken away. When someone lands 40 low blows without the ref saying "BOO" about it, there's a big problem.
                comparing clinching to deliberate low blows

                either obvious troll attempt or incredibly fucking ****** lol

                Comment

                • soul_survivor
                  LOL @ Ali-Holmes
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Jun 2013
                  • 18949
                  • 623
                  • 473
                  • 65,236

                  #9
                  Originally posted by slimshandy69
                  Not only did Lomenchenko win the fight on my score card by 2 rounds, nearly ko-ing solido, also computer box showed lomenchenko outlanding Solido. But the amount of Low blows Solido did should have resulted in disqualification.

                  This is on par with Amir khan lemont peterson robbery.
                  I don't think it was a robbery or a bad decision, what was bad though was the blatantly terrible refereeing in that fight. Salido should have been DQd or at the very least docked 2 points.

                  Comment

                  • removed
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Nov 2008
                    • 21479
                    • 4,005
                    • 831
                    • 164,542

                    #10
                    Who cares it was a horrible fight.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP