Pacman-MAB won't happen!!!!! ok?

[JoartCC]

please tell me you have more sence to actually belive this

I don't believe it, I'm just stating the obvious. Use common sense, PBF won't go down to 130 at the rate he's in and what's he's targeting, I know that it's impossible.

But since an idiot had the brains to point out the impossible, then I just stated the obvious reason why the impossibility of the occurence will stand.

[ReadyUp]

Ask your fellowman why he's more of an idiot to even start presenting that argument.

And you're more of an idiot than me for pointing this out. And anyway PBF going down to 130 is PACkoPBF in 1. PBF will be drained, pure common sense.

I just refuted his argument.

While you, can't present any pertinent counters either.

What's your position on Pac and Floyd while Floyd was at 130? What do you think the outcome would have been?

And I'm pretty sure he was just taunting by throwing that out there, you in all seriousness played it out like it was the real deal.

[JoartCC]

What's your position on Pac and Floyd while Floyd was at 130? What do you think the outcome would have been?

And I'm pretty sure he was just taunting by throwing that out there, you in all seriousness played it out like it was the real deal.

What's my position? Why ask about it? the point of this thread is about MAB. It's theoretical and it has no basis or added bonus to how I present my arguments.

Stick to the main argument. PAC fans should leave MAB alone because he is afraid of PAC. That's the main argument.

[moy22487]

I don't believe it, I'm just stating the obvious. Use common sense, PBF won't go down to 130 at the rate he's in and what's he's targeting, I know that it's impossible.

But since an idiot had the brains to point out the impossible, then I just stated the obvious reason why the impossibility of the occurence will stand.

what do you think if they meet at 135? do you think pacman would ever beat PBF?

[ReadyUp]

What's my position? Why ask about it? the point of this thread is about MAB. It's theoretical and it has no basis or added bonus to how I present my arguments.

Stick to the main argument. PAC fans should leave MAB alone because he is afraid of PAC. That's the main argument.

So it's okay for you to play out the PBF/Pac fight on this thread then I ask you a question about it, you ask me to stick to the main argument?

Very "logical" O' "consistent" one.

[moy22487]

What's my position? Why ask about it? the point of this thread is about MAB. It's theoretical and it has no basis or added bonus to how I present my arguments.

Stick to the main argument. PAC fans should leave MAB alone because he is afraid of PAC. That's the main argument.

you answered another question on this thread so it was hijacked like nuthuggers hijack every thread so now answer this question 2. would pac ever beat mab.
this thread was started just to insult not to make any real argument

[JoartCC]

So it's okay for you to play out the PBF/Pac fight on this thread then I ask you a question about it, you ask me to stick to the main argument?

Very "logical" O' "consistent" one.

Does it destroy my main argument? Does it weaken the position of my main point? Hell no!

Learn to use your arguments wisely so that it won't backfire on you.

The main point of this thread is MAB and PAC having a rematch. It's been nearly 3 years now since MAB has yet to issue his position on this matter. We only got one answer to this dilemna. He's afraid.

[moy22487]

Does it destroy my main argument? Does it weaken the position of my main point? Hell no!

Learn to use your arguments wisely so that it won't backfire on you.

The main point of this thread is MAB and PAC having a rematch. It's been nearly 3 years now since MAB has yet to issue his position on this matter. We only got one answer to this dilemna. He's afraid.

pacman turned down a fight on march 25th. yuo answered other questions on this tread that are away from the issue. you said pac would beat floyd you answered my question if you really belived that. now answer do you think pacman ever has a chance with floyd

[JoartCC]

you answered another question on this thread so it was hijacked like nuthuggers hijack every thread so now answer this question 2. would pac ever beat mab.
this thread was started just to insult not to make any real argument

Intentions on arguments whether to insult or to prove a point is of no consequence.

WHat matters is that when the arguments starts to heat up, you have your valid grounds to stand on.

And so far, you're standing on shaky ground.

A thread may be created to hate. But if the other side has the weapons and tools to turn that hate and make it backfire to the side whom it originated from, then it works to your advantage.

The problem is, you really have little to no basis at all to defend the point.

[ReadyUp]

Does it destroy my main argument? Does it weaken the position of my main point? Hell no!

Learn to use your arguments wisely so that it won't backfire on you.

The main point of this thread is MAB and PAC having a rematch. It's been nearly 3 years now since MAB has yet to issue his position on this matter. We only got one answer to this dilemna. He's afraid.

WHAT?! Do you ever read your own posts?

I asked you if it was okay for you to speak on the Pac/Mayweather comment and not okay for me to ask you question about it.

READING it's fundamental.