Pacquiao is awaiting Trinidad's Fate

[Bozo_no no]

u didnt jump in to correct me, u jumped in to blatantly insult me THEN correct me, leading me to believe that you have no tolerance of any imperfections and ur first impulse is to insult; the mentality of a child.

Would you like a tissue?

As I said, I was offended by your ignorance, so I pointed out it was ignorant, and derrived from misinformation. There was no personal insult in there, but it's obvious the degree of ignorance which was pointed out was painfull to you.

As I said, this can be avoided by not jumping in to correct someone when you don't know what you're talking about.

[GunStar]

The HBO poll a week or so later (I think it was the Jones Tarver renmatch) also had Pacquiao winning the fight by a wide vote.

Yea most polls I've seen on this fight, people had Pac winning. Also I agree with you you with the 10-6 round.

[Bozo_no no]

Yea most polls I've seen on this fight, people had Pac winning. Also I agree with you you with the 10-6 round.

I apreciate that, but it's really a given.

[TheEvilSaint]

Would you like a tissue?

As I said, I was offended by your ignorance, so I pointed out it was ignorant, and derrived from misinformation. There was no personal insult in there, but it's obvious the degree of ignorance which was pointed out was painfull to you.

As I said, this can be avoided by not jumping in to correct someone when you don't know what you're talking about.

why would you be offended by ignorance? do you realize that the world is filled with flaws that you will eventually have to admit and live with?

you couldve just posted the article instead of saying how ignorant my statement was.

[Bozo_no no]

why would you be offended by ignorance? do you realize that the world is filled with flaws that you will eventually have to admit and live with?

you couldve just posted the article instead of saying how ignorant my statement was.

Ignorance such as jumping in to correct someone when you couldn't be more wrong is offensive to me.

I thought it was as offensive to me as the response would have been to you, but evidently, I was wrong. You seem quite broken up about it.

Like I said, if you don't like having it pointed out, just don't correct someone when you don't know what you're talking about.

[TheEvilSaint]

Ignorance such as jumping in to correct someone when you couldn't be more wrong is offensive to me.

I thought it was as offensive to me as the response would have been to you, but evidently, I was wrong. You seem quite broken up about it.

Like I said, if you don't like having it pointed out, just don't correct someone when you don't know what you're talking about.

if you like being a pretensious *******, that ur problem. but dont go flaunting it to the world by pointing out mistakes.

[Bozo_no no]

if you like being a pretensious *******, that ur problem. but dont go flaunting it to the world by pointing out mistakes.

You don't see the irony in the fact that this all started when you thought you were pointing out a mistake, but that it turned out you had no idea what you're talking about?

lol.

You were wrong, it was pointed out.

Deal with it.

[GunStar]

I apreciate that, but it's really a given.

I agree!!!!!!!!!!!!

[BLOODSHED]

No, a boxer. JMM is a ***** for running from Pac. Do you think JMM will make the fight now that Pac took out better fighters in Morales and Barrera? No, he's content with hiding from Pacquiao. The truest ***** in the sport, JMM.

Juan Manuel Marquez already proved this! Take away that first round, and Pacman gets his ass handed to him. Lucky for him he built enough of a lead on the cards to get a "draw." He better stay the hell away from Zahir Raheem, because we will see a Winky-Tito type a$$ whoopin once again.

[morancito]

Ahhh, no, we can't.

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=44025&highlight=Pacquiao+Marquez

[IMG]http://i19.***********.com/albums/b163/dantzu/LedermancardPacquiaoMarquez.jpg[/IMG]


You're free to have whatever opinion you want, but if you felt Marquez won that fight you are in the minority.

Giving him the 9 rounds he needs inbetween 3-12 is very generous to JMM.

Rounds 7, 8 and 9 were JMM's. Even with a 10 - 6 score in the first round, JMM should have won the fight 113 - 112.

No Pac should've won that fight & if you look at all the polls most people think Pac won, even the Boxingscene poll had Pac winning by a big margin.

Gee, I wonder why.