When an obvious scorecard robbery takes place, who's doing the paying?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • nveleven
    Banned
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Sep 2013
    • 438
    • 32
    • 0
    • 655

    #1

    When an obvious scorecard robbery takes place, who's doing the paying?

    Close fights are one thing, but when canelo won on one of the judge's score cards against Mayweather, there was clearly some shadiness going on. So my question is: who's the most likely culprit in a fix?
    I know people like Arum are slime, but this seems like too big of a risk these days for a major promoter to be in on to be worth it. Everything we do is documented now. And if a major promoter gets caught once, their whole career tanks. So does the fix-organizing get sub-contracted out to a major bookie?
    Anyway, just curious.
    Last edited by nveleven; 06-14-2014, 02:37 PM.
  • Sugar Adam Ali
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Apr 2013
    • 27630
    • 970
    • 1,174
    • 82,827

    #2
    Not sure, probably alot of different scenarios, promoters, bookies, etc...

    But i honestly think, the bad judges keep getting the fights because they dont have to be told who to score for.. They know who is expected to win and they quietly make it happen without ever taking a "bribe" because they already make 7-8k per fight, and its a nice cush job, and they dont want to lose their judging spot, so they show loyalty to promoter or whatever, and they get to keep collecting fat checks for judging..

    Comment

    • HanzGruber
      STRAPMEUP
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Dec 2011
      • 29824
      • 1,069
      • 238
      • 81,632

      #3
      Most likely bookies. I think PAC was -450 vs Bradley 1. And the whole world was on him lol. Someone made a lot of money
      Last edited by HanzGruber; 06-14-2014, 02:43 PM.

      Comment

      • nveleven
        Banned
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Sep 2013
        • 438
        • 32
        • 0
        • 655

        #4
        Interesting--I hadn't considered the judges' inherent bias. Makes sense

        Comment

        • New England
          Strong champion.
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Oct 2010
          • 37514
          • 1,926
          • 1,486
          • 97,173

          #5
          i'd like to thank god and...

          Comment

          • Golden Boi 360
            Boxing's Biggest Cash Cow
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • May 2010
            • 5724
            • 402
            • 318
            • 86,855

            #6
            I just don't believe that bribes/fixes take place at the highest level in boxing. I feel that judges are just bad at scoring fights.

            This isn't the 20's anymore.

            Comment

            • UTEP
              Banned
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Oct 2006
              • 12078
              • 620
              • 599
              • 27,204

              #7
              Originally posted by Golden Boi 360
              I just don't believe that bribes/fixes take place at the highest level in boxing. I feel that judges are just bad at scoring fights.

              This isn't the 20's anymore.

              ^^^^^^This. The sport of boxing is clean nowadays

              Comment

              • jas
                Voice of Reason
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jul 2005
                • 22536
                • 936
                • 914
                • 1,059,614

                #8
                Originally posted by New England
                i'd like to thank god and...
                explains the scorecard on hopkins shumenov card


                paulie agreed with you

                Comment

                • teddycanyon
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Mar 2010
                  • 1373
                  • 38
                  • 48
                  • 7,571

                  #9
                  hometown decisions it could be the promoter. Promoter almost certainly had a hand in the De La Hoya-Sturm decision as he knew De La Hoya-Hopkins was right around the corner.

                  Also seedy individuals/organizations who are taking bets on the fight. CJ Ross probably had action on a Bradley win and a Floyd majority decision and was getting paid off by somebody to influence the decision. She'll deny it but it's more than likely true.

                  Comment

                  • Capaedia
                    JMM Stan
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jul 2011
                    • 2847
                    • 185
                    • 396
                    • 9,501

                    #10
                    Probably the highest bidder


                    Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP