Amir Khan V Lamont peter=Robbery of the decade

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Doctor_Tenma
    Monster
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Apr 2009
    • 33313
    • 1,327
    • 1,249
    • 58,127

    #11
    Originally posted by slimshandy69
    is that with the terrible point deductions????
    How about Khan getting awarded a knock down? Regardless of the points being taken, you can't argue that 1 point wasn't warranted.

    Comment

    • Build That Wall
      TRUMP 2024
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • May 2012
      • 18987
      • 679
      • 868
      • 78,835

      #12
      Originally posted by Rudiamonds
      PACandjmm3 is no where near Lara and Williams ....Lara vs William was a clear one sided fight ..pacjmm3 fight was very close no where near that level.....just wondering are you Mexican?
      nope.

      I'm

      Comment

      • -Kev-
        this is boxing
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Dec 2006
        • 39960
        • 5,045
        • 1,449
        • 234,543

        #13
        I had Khan winning by 1 point, so no that was not a robbery.

        Marquez-Pac III, Williams-Lara, Macklin-Sturm, Cloud-Campillo, Abril-Rios, Adamek-Cunningham, B-Hop-Pascal I, were all worse.

        Comment

        • Master Splinter
          Contender
          • Sep 2012
          • 137
          • 3
          • 0
          • 6,184

          #14
          Did Khan win a close decision? Absolutely. Robbery of the Decade? You must not watch enough boxing.

          Comment

          • BigAlexSand
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Apr 2012
            • 2325
            • 61
            • 68
            • 8,910

            #15
            I was one individual who believed that Peterson had won the fight. I don't like Khan style or did I believe he was dictating the fight. Peterson was fighting smart, hitting consistently and has Khan back stepping the entire fight. It has been quite a while since I have seen the fight but this is what I remember.

            Comment

            • slimshandy69
              I HAVE ***** TATTOO!
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Aug 2009
              • 3642
              • 323
              • 3
              • 16,514

              #16
              ive got khan 4 rounds up after 3, and so far computer box agrees. Round 1 should have been 10-7...

              Comment

              • Dr Rumack
                I Also Cook
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Oct 2012
                • 11870
                • 683
                • 303
                • 22,101

                #17
                Originally posted by slimshandy69
                is that with the terrible point deductions????
                The point deductions were justified. Khan's pushing was ridiculous. More refs should adopt that stance.

                Comment

                • -Kev-
                  this is boxing
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Dec 2006
                  • 39960
                  • 5,045
                  • 1,449
                  • 234,543

                  #18
                  Originally posted by slimshandy69
                  ive got khan 4 rounds up after 3, and so far computer box agrees. Round 1 should have been 10-7...
                  So according to Compubox Chad Dawson should have won 7-4 against Pascal since he outlanded Pascal in 7 out of 11 rounds and final punches landed was 134-114 in favor of Dawson. So I guess compubox agrees that Dawson actually won the fight, using your logic. BTW Pascal clearly won IMO, but I am just using your logic.

                  Comment

                  • boliodogs
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • May 2008
                    • 33358
                    • 824
                    • 1,782
                    • 309,589

                    #19
                    The poll doesn't seem to be going the way you wanted it to go. I am glad most agree with me that Peterson fought well. He took the fight to Khan, backed him up and landed more and better punches. He deserved the win and it was only a robbery to the most bias Khan fans. There have been some terrible robberies like the first Bradley-Pacquiao fight in this decade but this fight was not one of them. The right man won the fight.

                    Comment

                    • slimshandy69
                      I HAVE ***** TATTOO!
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Aug 2009
                      • 3642
                      • 323
                      • 3
                      • 16,514

                      #20
                      Originally posted by -Kev-
                      So according to Compubox Chad Dawson should have won 7-4 against Pascal since he outlanded Pascal in 7 out of 11 rounds and final punches landed was 134-114 in favor of Dawson. So I guess compubox agrees that Dawson actually won the fight, using your logic. BTW Pascal clearly won IMO, but I am just using your logic.
                      you had froch 11 rounds down against jermaine taylor going into the 12th round despite showtime having it a draw, and the press row and judges having it a split decision.

                      So i really dont care for your opinion at all, and your put on ignore..

                      bye...

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP