Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

TBE next opponent on Sept 13th according to WSOB is

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by VG_Addict View Post
    Porter had no reason to fight Thurman, who was and is still unproven. At least Paulie was coming off a win against Judah.
    Keep the excuses coming.

    Thurman is one of the biggest prospects at 147, he has a big reputation of being avoided, a win over him is certainly more impressive than a win over a washed up Pauli.

    I suggest you run off before you dig yourself into a deeper hole. You've really embarrassed yourself.

    Comment


    • #92
      Originally posted by Truth. View Post
      Keep the excuses coming.

      Thurman is one of the biggest prospects at 147, he has a big reputation of being avoided, a win over him is certainly more impressive than a win over a washed up Pauli.

      I suggest you run off before you dig yourself into a deeper. You've really embarrassed yourself.
      So, first you say that Paulie should have fought Thurman, then you whine that Porter fought Paulie, who was coming off a win over Judah, instead of Thurman? And now you're complaining that a "washed up" Paulie didn't fight Thurman?

      At this point in time, Porter is more proven than Thurman, with wins over Alexander and Paulie.

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by VG_Addict View Post
        Porter had no reason to fight Thurman, who was and is still unproven. At least Paulie was coming off a win against Judah.
        At some point we gotta stop acting like Porter has done anything that noteworthy, his best win is a fighter who should have had loses to Matthysse and Kotelnik. Second best win is against a shot, feather fisted one handed Paulie. Even if Porter is more proven it's to a point where it's not even worth mentioning it.

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by VG_Addict View Post
          So, first you say that Paulie should have fought Thurman, then you whine that Porter fought Paulie, who was coming off a win over Judah, instead of Thurman?
          Lmfaooo are you genuinely this thick or are you winding me up? I refuse to believe somebody can be THIS

          I didn't say Pauli should've fought Thurman, I said he along with others turned down a fight with Thurman. Do you not see the difference?

          My god, your comprehension skills need work.

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by Truth. View Post
            Lmfaooo are you genuinely this thick or are you winding me up? I refuse to believe somebody can be THIS

            I didn't say Pauli should've fought Thurman, I said he along with others turned down a fight with Thurman. Do you not see the difference?

            My god, your comprehension skills need work.
            What's the difference between "should have fought" and "turned down a fight"? Because you still complained that Paulie didn't fight Thurman.

            Comment


            • #96
              I'm all for maidana vs Thurman. Should be a good scrap

              Comment


              • #97
                Originally posted by VG_Addict View Post
                What's the difference between "should have fought" and "turned down a fight"? Because you still complained that Paulie didn't fight Thurman.
                You keep going on about how Thurman hasn't fought anybody and I named you some big 'names' who have turned down the fight.

                This is really basic stuff, it's incredible how you're struggling to understand.

                Comment


                • #98
                  Originally posted by Truth. View Post
                  You keep going on about how Thurman hasn't fought anybody and I gave some big 'names' who have turned down the fight.

                  This is really basic stuff, it's incredible how you're struggling to understand.
                  Those fighters wouldn't have gained anything from fighting a relative unknown in Thurman. You're delusional if you think Thurman is some big name.

                  Thurman is high risk, low reward.

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Originally posted by VG_Addict View Post
                    Those fighters wouldn't have gained anything from fighting a relative unknown in Thurman. You're delusional if you think Thurman is some big name.

                    Thurman is high risk, low reward.
                    lol...

                    Porter turned down Thurman to fight a washed up Pauli, a win over Thurman woud've been far more impressive.

                    Maidana turned down Thurman in 2012 and fought Soto Karass instead. Wtf did he gain from that?

                    Guerrero turned down Thurman to fight some Japanese guy I've never heard of. He would've gained more from fighting Thurman.

                    Etc etc

                    You clearly don't know what you're talking about.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Truth. View Post
                      lol...

                      Porter turned down Thurman to fight a washed up Pauli, a win over Thurman woud've been far more impressive.

                      Maidana turned down Thurman in 2012 and fought Soto Karass instead. Wtf did he gain from that?

                      Guerrero turned down Thurman to fight some Japanese guy I've never heard of. He would've gained more from fighting Thurman.

                      Etc etc

                      You clearly don't know what you're talking about.
                      OK, tell me. Who was Thurman in the grand scheme of things in 2012? What did he do that year to deserve a fight with Maidana?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP