Comments Thread For: Carl Froch: I'm Not Going To Rush into Anything
Collapse
-
I'm always of the opinion that if it makes dollars, it makes sense so I don't know who you think you're talking to.That's where you're missing the buck. If Froch had any kinda sack about him. He's the one that needs Ward. Your kind confuse me. When it comes to your favs. If it makes dollars it makes sense. When it not one of your favs. Its all guts, glory, and legacy. Which one is it?
Broner has won paper titles in two divisions and a pretty legitimate title at lightweight. Froch has won multiple paper titles in a single division. At least at some point in his career, Broner had a legitimate argument that he wad the best in a division. That has never been the case with Froch.And what makes it worse is that he's too big a b1tch to try his luck against the best again. And f@gg0ts like you applaud it.
Broner is a fraud who got exposed as soon as he fought someone that could hit back. What a terrible comparison.Comment
-
If Broner continued fighting as a lightweight he's probably still undefeated.Comment
-
Comment
-
Your absolutely worthless to listen to, must be the super mannered brits who can't help themselves who keep on replying to you. You sound like a cracked old LP just going loops over and over again.
Ps. Ward is irrelevant. He made himself that. Eat it and please don't reply.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Froch was/is interested in the Golovkin bout. It's amusing to see you talk Golovkin up when you spend so much time talking him down in other threads.Translation: I have no interest in getting my ass kicked by Ward again. I also have no interest in getting my brain sent into orbit by GGG. So in the event I'm not able to convince the delusional dumbasses that actually think I'm good that third fights with Kessler or Groves are good fights. I'm a try my luck with a big named bum Chavez Jr or fight some C class Euro bum with a trumped up record.Comment
Comment