Line his fighters up for mandatory shots, then take them overseas for a beating on foreign soil?
I thought the idea of positioning a marque fighter for a mandatory shot is that you can negotiate on fairer terms.
Frank Warren has paid to bring over some great champions to fight in the UK against his challengers. Yet Eddie hasn't.
The reason why I mention this is because it's looking like Kell Brook is having to go to America. No problem with that, but he was fed bums for years and the excuse was so he could have a favourable mandatory shot.
This was the excuse to why he didn't take the Bradley fight. What was so different in the terms of the Bradley fight than the porter one? In my opinion fans have been conned.
I thought the idea of positioning a marque fighter for a mandatory shot is that you can negotiate on fairer terms.
Frank Warren has paid to bring over some great champions to fight in the UK against his challengers. Yet Eddie hasn't.
The reason why I mention this is because it's looking like Kell Brook is having to go to America. No problem with that, but he was fed bums for years and the excuse was so he could have a favourable mandatory shot.
This was the excuse to why he didn't take the Bradley fight. What was so different in the terms of the Bradley fight than the porter one? In my opinion fans have been conned.
Comment