Which fighter getting exposed has been your most satisfying moment?

[Pugilist95]

Danny Garcia to an extent, I am a fan of his but I have always felt that his fans overrated him before the Herrera fight.

[Martinplateado]

Broner no doubt about it

[#1Assassin]

the only one of those four who could be considered a hypejob is berto.

i didnt even think taylor beat hopkins either time but if he was a hypejob it wouldnt even be close, nor would he have given pavlik all he could handle in their rematch or came 13 seconds away from beating froch. froch cant be much good if he struggled that badly with a mere hypejob, except taylor is no hypejob and froch is a freaking beast.

you have to look at the whole fight (which i know booty deew doesnt). stop looking on boxrec and acting like you know the fighters. taylor was exposed to an extent, that he had stamina issues and a below average chin. but he has several great attributes too and you can prove yourself in defeat as well which taylor has done.

broner is a three division world champion with one loss, ONE. he didnt even perform that poorly in the loss and he was fighting a much bigger man. a loss is always bad, but any time a fighter loses it doesnt mean he was a hypejob which is basically what you are saying. broner took on a tough challenge and came up short, it happens to the best of them. im not saying he will be a great fighter, but the jury is still clearly out on broner. its waaaaaaay too early dismiss him.

peterson? really? he got outboxed by one of the best p4p fighter in bradley and caught by one of the best punchers in matthysse. which part makes him a hypejob? again, everyone isnt floyd mayweather or ricardo lopez. the vast, vast majority of fighters will lose in their careers. peterson lost to two very good fighters because that what happens in great matchups, someone comes up short. the man has some very impressive wins of his own and a long way to go in his career. but he could really retire right now and he did enough to prove he is a good fighter (to anyone who knows jack **** about boxing that is).

you do a list of exposed hypejobs (something there are hundreds of), can only come up with four and three of them dont even fit the criteria. LOL!

epic fail even by booty deew standards.

[jas]

Taylor didn't really get exposed......he fought tough competition and was competitive against the best in the divisions....he just lost something after knockouts.

[NearHypnos]

Some of the posters here dont seem to know what expose means lol.


A lot of good shouts though.

Jermaine Taylor though? Really? >__>... No, man. Just...no

[Rome-By-Ko]

the only one of those four who could be considered a hypejob is berto.

i didnt even think taylor beat hopkins either time but if he was a hypejob it wouldnt even be close, nor would he have given pavlik all he could handle in their rematch or came 13 seconds away from beating froch. froch cant be much good if he struggled that badly with a mere hypejob, except taylor is no hypejob and froch is a freaking beast.

you have to look at the whole fight (which i know booty deew doesnt). stop looking on boxrec and acting like you know the fighters. taylor was exposed to an extent, that he had stamina issues and a below average chin. but he has several great attributes too and you can prove yourself in defeat as well which taylor has done.

broner is a three division world champion with one loss, ONE. he didnt even perform that poorly in the loss and he was fighting a much bigger man. a loss is always bad, but any time a fighter loses it doesnt mean he was a hypejob which is basically what you are saying. broner took on a tough challenge and came up short, it happens to the best of them. im not saying he will be a great fighter, but the jury is still clearly out on broner. its waaaaaaay too early dismiss him.

peterson? really? he got outboxed by one of the best p4p fighter in bradley and caught by one of the best punchers in matthysse. which part makes him a hypejob? again, everyone isnt floyd mayweather or ricardo lopez. the vast, vast majority of fighters will lose in their careers. peterson lost to two very good fighters because that what happens in great matchups, someone comes up short. the man has some very impressive wins of his own and a long way to go in his career. but he could really retire right now and he did enough to prove he is a good fighter (to anyone who knows jack **** about boxing that is).

you do a list of exposed hypejobs (something there are hundreds of), can only come up with four and three of them dont even fit the criteria. LOL!

epic fail even by booty deew standards.

I agree with this..

[Suckmedry]

Lol at jermain Taylor being a hype job. Taylor was a quality fighter, like others said the ko losses just took his prime away.

[FerFAL]

The ass beating that Broner got was epic in so many ways, the humiliation suffered so fking gratifying they should do scientific research so as to explain exactly how that works in people's brains.
College thesis proposal "Endorphin release & Broner getting his ass kicked"

[Lalaland]

Lamont PEDerson.

[Furn]

Some of the posters here dont seem to know what expose means lol.


A lot of good shouts though.

Jermaine Taylor though? Really? >__>... No, man. Just...no

Yeah we do.

If you don't win every minute of every round and don't fight top 5 p4p fighters exclusively you're a hype job and you've been exposed.