HBO Willing to let Quillin onto their network

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • brick wall
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Feb 2008
    • 6480
    • 259
    • 35
    • 24,574

    #41
    schaefer is a troll...hbo cut ties with gbp because of that business model (bidding) and here he is proposing it to a hbo fighter.

    Comment

    • The Raw Dog
      Banned
      • Nov 2011
      • 417
      • 40
      • 10
      • 542

      #42
      Originally posted by brick wall
      schaefer is a troll...hbo cut ties with gbp because of that business model (bidding) and here he is proposing it to a hbo fighter.
      Because it's not in the best interest of a network, but if its in the best interest of the fighter and maximizes their earning potential...why be mad?

      Comment

      • M Bison
        Perfect, but you're not
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Mar 2012
        • 15677
        • 600
        • 798
        • 32,424

        #43
        Originally posted by SnakeVen0m
        I'm pretty sure Schaeffer will stall and will immediately make Canelo-Quillin next, weather he beats Lara or not.
        Quillin isn't good enough to beat Canelo... ****** fight but it'd be better than throwing him in with GGG.

        Comment

        • The Raw Dog
          Banned
          • Nov 2011
          • 417
          • 40
          • 10
          • 542

          #44
          Originally posted by daggum
          golovking gets the best ratings on hbo so he already is in the mainstream. quillin fights on undercards so he's not. real numbers>anecdotal evidence of people in brooklyn following quillin
          Whatever too each its own...

          Comment

          • brick wall
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Feb 2008
            • 6480
            • 259
            • 35
            • 24,574

            #45
            Originally posted by The Raw Dog
            Because it's not in the best interest of a network, but if its in the best interest of the fighter and maximizes their earning potential...why be mad?

            yeah that's why maidana only got 1.25 million for the floyd fight courtesy of scheafer/haymon/sho...they got the fighters' best interest.

            Comment

            • The Raw Dog
              Banned
              • Nov 2011
              • 417
              • 40
              • 10
              • 542

              #46
              Originally posted by brick wall
              yeah that's why maidana only got 1.25 million for the floyd fight courtesy of scheafer/haymon/sho...they got the fighters' best interest.
              When did Maidana state that?

              Comment

              • brick wall
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Feb 2008
                • 6480
                • 259
                • 35
                • 24,574

                #47
                Originally posted by The Raw Dog
                When did Maidana state that?

                state what?

                it's 1.5 million by the way not 1.25...still way too low for a fight of that magnitude.

                Comment

                • The Raw Dog
                  Banned
                  • Nov 2011
                  • 417
                  • 40
                  • 10
                  • 542

                  #48
                  Originally posted by brick wall
                  state what?

                  it's 1.5 million by the way not 1.25...still way too low for a fight of that magnitude.
                  If you don't have any credible evidence to support a statement like that, then you really shouldn't make it. Truth is, unless Maidana, his Management, his promoter, or even his trainer have gone on record stating as much, I can't even acknowledge your statement as being something worth discussing. Your giving your unsubstantiated opinion, which sounds like it could be proven to be a lie.

                  Comment

                  • wiz1030
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Nov 2013
                    • 1414
                    • 29
                    • 1
                    • 7,617

                    #49
                    Originally posted by Hougigo
                    Dunno what to think.


                    looking at Glaser's timeline, he said that Oscar has under 25 guys signed to Golden Boy. The rest are Haymon. That's crazy, Schaefer is one devious cat if it's all true

                    Comment

                    • brick wall
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Feb 2008
                      • 6480
                      • 259
                      • 35
                      • 24,574

                      #50
                      Originally posted by The Raw Dog
                      If you don't have any credible evidence to support a statement like that, then you really shouldn't make it. Truth is, unless Maidana, his Management, his promoter, or even his trainer have gone on record stating as much, I can't even acknowledge your statement as being something worth discussing. Your give your unsubstantiated opinion, which should like it could be proven to be a lie.

                      it's widely reported by the media and there's no objection from maidana's camp or his promoter so it must be true.

                      does it surprises you that schaefer and haymon doesn't have the fighters' best interest? you're delusional if you thought so.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP