Ricky Hatton: "Amir Khan Will Never Be Defeated If He Boxes Instead of Brawls."

[tank17211]

Hatton says that the only reason Khan was ever defeated is because he chose to brawl instead of box smart but his recent mature performance against Collazo means Khan may never again be defeated, even by Mayweather.

What about when someone finally hits him??

[arraamis]

Peterson was on Roids, Khan dropped Maidana like a 2 $ hooker you find in the streets and made him roll all over the canvas crying in pain what about McCloskey? Khan won every second of every round.
You would always find a reason to discredit Khan's win no matter what as the previous poster said I'd love for Khan to hold and clinch the f*** out of his opponents even worse next time to get a convincing win, just to shut you morons up

Yeah, Maidana went down from a body shot .... And then, like always he got up and was ready to kick some azz ... and that's when, as usual, Khan got on his bike and ran like the wind for the remainder of the fight.

Now if that's what you Khan-groupies would like to interpret as a legit win, then all power to you all. But to those who have watched and boxed themselves .... that's BS!!!!!

Its easy to discredit Khan, because his credentials are shaky at best. Its you tards that have to struggle constantly to uphold your idol.

See, here the bottom line .... If Khan was as great as his delusional conned fans believed, it would be easy to state the facts. But because its all an illusion -- You nuthugger's restate the same talking points over and over hoping somebody else will join your misguided, misinformed, delusional group.

And many are not having any part of that delusion ........

[MONGOOSE66]

I agree with Hatton. If Khan NEVER looked for the KO he would be real tuff to out point.

[Box-Office]

Yeah, Maidana went down from a body shot .... And then, like always he got up and was ready to kick some azz ... and that's when, as usual, Khan got on his bike and ran like the wind for the remainder of the fight.

Yes, because going down from a body shot is lesser of a knockdown than being dropped from a shot to the face/head.

Now if that's what you Khan-groupies would like to interpret as a legit win, then all power to you all. But to those who have watched and boxed themselves .... that's BS!!!!!

Rrrright! but losing to Peterson was legit loss. Great logic...Golf Clap.

What does it even mean that you have boxed so the win is bull ****? So, what? I have boxed as an amateur too and? Having boxed gives you great insight than the ones who haven't, but the authority to call facts b.s isn't something you attain from having boxed. Like the fact Khan dropped and beat Maidana in a fight that was suppose to end his career and that it was a great win.

Its easy to discredit Khan, because his credentials are shaky at best. Its you tards that have to struggle constantly to uphold your idol.

You make no sense at all.............as usual.

Struggle? You struggle pretty hard to bad mouth every and anything Khan does. Never have I doubted that you will there on a Khan thread babbling your constant b.s.

See, here the bottom line .... If Khan was as great as his delusional conned fans believed, it would be easy to state the facts. But because its all an illusion -- You nuthugger's restate the same talking points over and over hoping somebody else will join your misguided, misinformed, delusional group.

And many are not having any part of that delusion ........

Khan is not great, but very good.

You cling on to Thurman when Khan has Guerrero, Porter and Maidana as options. You complain about Mccloskey rematch which means jack as Khan dominated him till the stoppage and the Peterson loss is genuine to you. Picked Collazo to shock Khan, but bad mouth him as a **** win.

You call us nut huggers etc, but you are just a sad hater who pretends Khan's best wins never happened and his record 0-3. Keep hating.

[Lalaland]

Yeah, Maidana went down from a body shot .... And then, like always he got up and was ready to kick some azz ... and that's when, as usual, Khan got on his bike and ran like the wind for the remainder of the fight.

Now if that's what you Khan-groupies would like to interpret as a legit win, then all power to you all. But to those who have watched and boxed themselves .... that's BS!!!!!

Its easy to discredit Khan, because his credentials are shaky at best. Its you tards that have to struggle constantly to uphold your idol.

See, here the bottom line .... If Khan was as great as his delusional conned fans believed, it would be easy to state the facts. But because its all an illusion -- You nuthugger's restate the same talking points over and over hoping somebody else will join your misguided, misinformed, delusional group.

And many are not having any part of that delusion ........

What do you mean '' would like to interpret as a legit win''? off course it was in every form of the Rule Book (I guess the McCloskey fight you're referring to? Its you being delusional if you think McCloskey was doing some jack **** before the stoppage). No one overrates Khan or calls him some ATG we all know his weaknesses and downfalls, But you idiots talk like he gets KTFO in every other fight (while he's been KO'd only once i.e against Prescott and Garcia fight was a stoppage where Khan finished on his feet). He has some good Wins in his resume that you morons don't give him credit for and he once was World Champion at 140 just at the age of 22 and Unified Champion at 24, these are the facts you can't deny.

[talz]

Paulie- Is and never was a great boxer he is was B- class at best

Kotelnyk= who???lmfao

Collazo- has been irrelevant for over half a decade

Judah-wow really Judah?? dude hasn't been relevant since Cotto finished him off

Shutting out a B class boxer like never before is impressive. Kotelnyk schooled alexander and average boxer don't win olympic silver medals. Collazo came of his best win in his career before the khan fight, robbed vs hatton and berto. Only irrelevant due to his bad luck with injuries.

Judah gave mathysse his first loss and ko'd mabuzza before the khan fight. He was also outboxing floyd and beating him for speed for a few rounds and gave floyd his first knockdown!

Floyd hasn't fought many boxers, he likes them flat footed, come forward, mostly drained fighters. Khan would UD floyd.

He lost.

He beat him in a rematch....

[arraamis]

Incoherent babble, that doesn't address a single point that was raised.

Your post is a perfect example of the Khan-tards rap .... You don't address a single talking point or issue that was raised -- Instead you present rehearsed phrases that have no relevancy to the points.

You didn't address the fact that Khan was running non-stop after getting the body-shot KD ..... Did you?

You don't present a single shred of proof to support the shit you're typing. And Yet, I can present video after video of Khan way of winning. Hit and run like a freakin deer caught in headlights.

Now, you present your proof that Khan the great is all that and I'll present all the videos showing just how much a fake Khan is ..... Accept that Bitch!!!

What do you mean '' would like to interpret as a legit win''? off course it was in every form of the Rule Book (I guess the McCloskey fight you're referring to? Its you being delusional if you think McCloskey was doing some jack **** before the stoppage). No one overrates Khan or calls him some ATG we all know his weaknesses and downfalls, But you idiots talk like he gets KTFO in every other fight (while he's been KO'd only once i.e against Prescott and Garcia fight was a stoppage where Khan finished on his feet). He has some good Wins in his resume that you morons don't give him credit for and he once was World Champion at 140 just at the age of 22 and Unified Champion at 24, these are the facts you can't deny.

You two guys are two sides of the same idiot coin .... What, are all Khan-groupies clowns that post the same talking points without providing a single piece of evidence.

So, we're supposed to take some ******s opinion over actual video showing how much of a fraud Khan is ?!?!?!?!?

Add to that the fact that he's a blatant lier as well -- Just ask Ward

[hugh grant]

Hattons in awe of Khan as he handled Collazo easily, whilst Hatton went life and death with Collazo?

But that was years ago and Collazo isn't that beast from years ago.

[Lalaland]

Your post is a perfect example of the Khan-tards rap .... You don't address a single talking point or issue that was raised -- Instead you present rehearsed phrases that have no relevancy to the points.

You didn't address the fact that Khan was running non-stop after getting the body-shot KD ..... Did you?

You don't present a single shred of proof to support the shit you're typing. And Yet, I can present video after video of Khan way of winning. Hit and run like a freakin deer caught in headlights.

Now, you present your proof that Khan the great is all that and I'll present all the videos showing just how much a fake Khan is ..... Accept that Bitch!!!



You two guys are two sides of the same idiot coin .... What, are all Khan-groupies clowns that post the same talking points without providing a single piece of evidence.

So, we're supposed to take some ******s opinion over actual video showing how much of a fraud Khan is ?!?!?!?!?

Add to that the fact that he's a blatant lier as well -- Just ask Ward

So by your logic Khan runs in every fight yet he has 19 KO's in 32 fights?, what about Mayweather then? The Best Ever? Should we just tag his as the Ultimate Runner inside the Ring?

You son are a definition of True ****** no point arguing with a sore ****** like you.

and Yes there's videos all over Youtube Khan Stopping Malignaggi, Dropping Maidana like a Street Hooker, Dropping PEDerson twice in 1st round, Knocking Judah Out with a Bodyshot, knocking Collazo down 3 times 3 times almost Knocking Him Out. Seeya

[arraamis]