You don't have to be a kid or a big Pacquiao fan to vote for him. I am thinking many that say Armstong would be a sure winner never saw film of him and are going by the old timers saying he was the 2nd best fighter of all time. Armstrong was beatable and the proof is all those losses he took during his prime. Some of the men that beat him probably were not as good as Pacquiao.
Pacquiao vs Armstrong who wins.
Collapse
-
Most people on this forum have never heard of Armstrong. I expect Pacquiao to win the poll by a landslide.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Big armstrong fan here, but Pacquiaos speed is bad news for him. Pac is stronger faster and better conditioned.
Comparing athletes from 80 years ago to the best athletes from today is unrealistic and frankly laughable.
We can respect the old timers, but at the same time lets be real.Comment
-
Comment
-
Advancements in nutrition and training methods, need to be taken into accountBig armstrong fan here, but Pacquiaos speed is bad news for him. Pac is stronger faster and better conditioned.
Comparing athletes from 80 years ago to the best athletes from today is unrealistic and frankly laughable.
We can respect the old timers, but at the same time lets be real.Comment
Comment