Anyone else notice this? I think maybe they're genetically superior? I read a study where women found the best cyclists the most attractive (without knowing they were the best)
Maybe male handsomeness is an indicator of fighting prowess and mate quality? I would guess that elite fighters have good genetics and this was favourable during mate selection, competing for mates and securing resources, defending from animals etc.
Most of the good fighters have good dishes, Pacquiao and Mayweather, Oscar De La Hoya, Wlad, Cotto, Martinez, Golovkin.... whilst the crappy fighters are usually pretty gormless (Froch, groves).
No **** btw... just an observation...
no ****.
in what universe is manny good looking? dude looks like boiled ass. GGG, wlad and floyd are the definition of average looking.
Pacquiao is not good looking in the least if looks alone are judged. Froch on the other hand would probably be considered sexy by many women. Heck, I think even Groves is better looking than Pacquiao based on looks. Also, Tyson wasn't good looking and he was the best. Neither was Holyfield, etc. Their attitudes, fame, fortune and talent made them attractive and their physiques. Their faces weren't attractive. Just look at Rid**** Bowe too.
So let me try and understand this...u watch a boxer and notice his skills...u become fan and say to ur self wow this guy is a future hall of famer and all time great!!....and u know what?! This n!gga is mad cute too!
Comment