More Enjoyable: Barrera-Hamed or Maidana-Broner?

[Awesome-O]

Unfortunately we never got to see Hamed knocked silly, as it would have been enjoyable to see him suffer a Tszyu-Judah, Tyson-Berbick, Jones-Griffin 2, or even a KTFO case like Ruddock-Dokes or him on the floor like Fishnet against Snaggle tooth.

We still have hope for Broner. As it is, which fight was more enjoyable?

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-UX8fOarUb_c/Uq0xGm_OfjI/AAAAAAAA-Mw/zzxOc9-dEaE/s1600/00.gif

[removed]

Hamed was too good to be knocked 'silly'.

[White_Knight]

You initial reaction is to say Maidana vs Broner. However, Barrera schooled Hamed into retirement, whereas Broner has come back dumber and more annoying than ever.

It's a tough call.

[A-Wolf]

lmao @ option #2.

[Accountoffline]

Hamed was arrogant but could back it up, Broner is just a fully fledged dickhead.

[Cee Mac Eleven]

Just watched Barrera vs Hamed. What a beating Hamed took.

And jim lampley was a fuccin' prick. I swear, Foreman was about to beat his ass. Lol.

Anyhow, both were great fights.

[Dr Rumack]

Tough call. Broner's beatdown was more violent and humiliating on the whole I think. Barrera just neutralised Naz without ever really giving him a serious ass-kicking.

[FrankieBruno]

Comparing a great boxer with some of the greatest reflexes and deadly power to a flat footed bum like Broner

Also Hammed was pretty much in the worst shape of his life and past his prime when he fought Barrera, and still put up a good fight

[Cuauhtémoc1520]

For me it was Barrera over Naz. Both fights were good guys vs loud mouth idiots who were humbled and brought back down to earth.

[Chrismart]

Broner by far for me. At least Hamed had skills to back up his talk.
Watching Broner and Max Kellerman act like he had beat a GOAT after the Rees fight was one of the most crigeworth-iest things i've seen in a ring for a long time.