some of the DUMBEST comments in boxingscene history? flashback

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Manny_P
    Knicks/Yankees/Giants
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • May 2005
    • 8966
    • 542
    • 799
    • 19,102

    #61
    Originally posted by Goldenboyprm
    Glad to see you back after your 8th ban.

    I know you must have been counting the minutes till you served your time. Haha.
    i been back fo a while just dint post


    how's the right hand doin? Can you throw a proper punch now?

    Comment

    • ReadyUp
      Pound 4 Pound
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Feb 2005
      • 3860
      • 224
      • 738
      • 10,840

      #62
      Originally posted by Manny_P
      i been back fo a while just dint post


      how's the right hand doin? Can you throw a proper punch now?
      I could easily break your face if that's what your asking.

      Comment

      • Manny_P
        Knicks/Yankees/Giants
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • May 2005
        • 8966
        • 542
        • 799
        • 19,102

        #63
        Originally posted by Goldenboyprm
        I could easily break your face if that's what your asking.
        yea, you're Nikolai's size.

        KEYBOARD WARRIOR!
        Last edited by Manny_P; 02-23-2006, 11:14 AM.

        Comment

        • ReadyUp
          Pound 4 Pound
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Feb 2005
          • 3860
          • 224
          • 738
          • 10,840

          #64
          Haha. I'm the keyboard warrior?
          Can you show me some facts, claim, reason, illogical, consistent, or elites to back up your statement?

          Bring back your picture of you with the little glove again, you need to put the 2 dollar glove over your ugly face "data".

          Comment

          • JoartCC
            Banned
            • Feb 2006
            • 2439
            • 157
            • 0
            • 3,087

            #65
            Originally posted by Goldenboyprm
            Haha. I'm the keyboard warrior?
            Can you show me some facts, claim, reason, illogical, consistent, or elites to back up your statement?

            Bring back your picture of you with the little glove again, you need to put the 2 dollar glove over your ugly face "data".
            Ahh, PAC? lol!

            I don't really blame you. Bad education coupled with lazy lifestyle makes for a bum with a brained head. Cya.

            Comment

            • JoartCC
              Banned
              • Feb 2006
              • 2439
              • 157
              • 0
              • 3,087

              #66
              Originally posted by Goldenboyprm
              Alright, so back then Pac wasn't determined? He just kind of showed up to get knocked out right. Then one day, he said I'll be determined and thus had a great chin? Wow. If it's as easy as that everyone should box. Just as long as they are determined.

              Did you ever think that maybe he was depleting himself at lower weights and wasn't as physically strong as he is now at 126/130? Hmm...I guess that's to LOGICAL of an answer for you. He's physically stronger and can take a punch better at this weight. It has nothing to do with determination moron.
              Nothing to do with determination? No wonder MAB is a *****, no wonder EM's camp is trying to make fight PAC at 132.

              because when it comes down to it. Mexican champs like these 2 are exposed "chickengays" (like one poster here said).

              Chin is a combination is genes, will and training. Use common sense buddy.

              Comment

              • DIEGO DA HITMAN
                Interim Champion
                Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                • Jan 2006
                • 648
                • 41
                • 40
                • 6,903

                #67
                Originally posted by raesaad
                Where the **** did you come from Jabs is one of the best posters on this site.......
                I've gotta agree, and Raeseed's a very logical poster, as well.

                Comment

                • JoartCC
                  Banned
                  • Feb 2006
                  • 2439
                  • 157
                  • 0
                  • 3,087

                  #68
                  Originally posted by DIEGO DA HITMAN
                  I've gotta agree, and Raeseed's a very logical poster, as well.
                  Well, looking at the results of his arguments lately, one can argue if he has any rationale on his arguments at all.

                  Arguments must be substantiated by results. Not just mere theoretical and baseless flatteries.

                  Comment

                  • DIEGO DA HITMAN
                    Interim Champion
                    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                    • Jan 2006
                    • 648
                    • 41
                    • 40
                    • 6,903

                    #69
                    The dumbest posts on this site generally involve Princess Hamed, Tyson, Wlad Klitschko, British fighters from past decades (wonder who that's referring to?), and hypothetical matchups. In my opinion, bias is okay, if you pre-cursor your post with "I'm a little biased", "This is what I hope", "I've gotta be optimistic about...", etc. Everyone is going to be a little biased, but you don't let that bias make you blind to reality. My favorite boxer is Diego Corrales, but I'd be lying if I said, "I guarantee Chico will beat Castillo in the rubber match". I hope he does, but it's a big mountain to climb.

                    Comment

                    • jabsRstiff
                      ! ! ! !
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Jun 2004
                      • 8964
                      • 498
                      • 136
                      • 16,167

                      #70
                      Originally posted by JoartCC
                      Well, looking at the results of his arguments lately, one can argue if he has any rationale on his arguments at all.

                      Arguments must be substantiated by results. Not just mere theoretical and baseless flatteries.

                      Tell me.....

                      1)How was Zaragoza a "noob" when he fought Morales.

                      2)What it is Pacquiao does, while fighting, that shows he has better boxing skills than Duran had.

                      Do so, please, without getting angry. You claim to be a master debater, one who uses facts & logic. Don't be a hypocrite, be an adult.

                      Thanks.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP