That fight was no robbery or draw..
Collapse
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Again,your wrong here..I and many others had the fight a draw or Floyd ahead in the fight after six rds..145 was the only rds I thought Maidana clearly won early in the fight..I gave May rds 2 3 and 6,I'll admit 6 was a very close rd tho..Past 6 Mayweather took over the fight..So no I don't feel that those scores were bad..I said what I said. Maidana was promoted as a KO artist yet they robbed him of that opportunity by removing his most important weapon. His punchers gloves.
Then you had those crazy scores that were wrong when you look a their scores. Floyd should NOT have been wining the fight after 6 rounds. Those were Maidana's best rounds. Scores were bad! Best score was 114-114. One can say 7-5 for either Floyd or Maidana and one can't complain too much. So in that sense no, not a robbery but the scores were terrible by 2 judges. Just look at the early rounds. Unacceptable!
Promoting the fight:
This is an extremely dangerous fight for Floyd as Marcos Maidana is a technical knock-out artist and continues to show us............;
said Leonard EllerbeComment
-
Can you show me where thats one of the criteria for scoring a fight? Last I checked, connect percentage has absolutely nothing to do with who won and who lost.Comment
-
I thought Cotto fought Floyd better. Maidana did landed a lot of body punches, but his offense wasn't as effective as some people thought it was, they were just happy that Maidana was able to bullied Floyd without consistently landed cleanly. 7-5 or 8-4 Floyd. Competitive fight, but Cotto had better moments where he landed more accurately against Floyd upstairs and downstairs.Comment
-
You my dude Math,but 5-1 is not a very good card bro..It's like you was not giving May any credit for anything he was doing in there..Comment
-
To the highlighted,that's your opinion and your welcome to it..
I don't know if I agree that the fight could have went either way..At least your not gonna call it a robbery..Which would have been a joke..Comment

Comment