Does Khan's win over Collazo put him in the top 10?

[FrankieBruno]

top 10 for sure

[John Locke]

Yep, definitely top 10

[Croyd]

Khan fought a slow moving punching bag last night but yes I still think he's top ten for WW division.

[Dr Rumack]

This is the transnational rankings top 10 at 147 - http://www.tbrb.org/all-rankings/#147

I'd drop Brook and have Khan in there.

It was a good if typically patchy performance from Khan. A lot of the flaws still there but clearly improved in many respects. A degree of vindication for Virgil Hunter I think.

[HWChampion]

Most definitely collazo is a solid ww and a stern test.

[mathed]

definitely top 10 dirtiest fighter in the sport

[mathed]

Khan fought a slow moving punching bag last night but yes I still think he's top ten for WW division.

It looked like Collazo was paid to bring his d game and the ref was paid to ensure Khan got the win as well.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

It looked like Collazo was paid to bring his d game and the ref was paid to ensure Khan got the win as well.

Are you paid to come on here and act like a spastic?

Because you should be. You do a great job.

[Lullaby]

Offcourse, without question. Khan's career was literally on the line tonight and he looked really good against a tough WW.

[Adzz]

i'd have him at #9 best ww....khan's performance had more to do with collazo having zero defense, barely throwing, and having his hands down to his side 90% of the time...

khan would get ko'ed by porter and especially thurman...

i agree with you, he should be in the top 10 around #8 atleast.

on your second point, have you thought about the fact that khan did not give collazo a chance with his constant footwork and Collazo dropping hands was part of his frustration keeping up with khan.

(Khan made collazo look average on the night )