Comments Thread For: Collazo: Khan Doesn't Do Well With Southpaws Like Me
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Dude, I don't recall McCloskey landing a single solid, clean shot on Khan. Khan was a little too cautious in that fight considering how little a threat McCloskey was, but he still outworked and outlanded McCloskey in every round.Comment
-
This is what I'm talking about when I say a lot of people will come up with anything to discredit Khan. The "bad" Judah showed up, Maidana was a completely different fighter back then etc.
Imagine if a Khan fan said the "bad" Khan showed up against Garcia. People would throw a hissy fit and say he is delusional and butthurt.Comment
-
I am not trying to discredit ****. Read what I wrote slowly. To say that Khan is good against southpaws when he has only fought two of them makes no sense. To say that he is bad against southpaws because he fought two them makes no sense as well. Where did I lie about Judah? Is he not an up and down fighter?This is what I'm talking about when I say a lot of people will come up with anything to discredit Khan. The "bad" Judah showed up, Maidana was a completely different fighter back then etc.
Imagine if a Khan fan said the "bad" Khan showed up against Garcia. People would throw a hissy fit and say he is delusional and butthurt.Comment
-
What are you even saying? The bad judah? What? Just an excuse to discredit even the things Khan did good.
The Judah that fought Khan was the IBF World Champion and was fighting Khan in a "unification" bout. Also had beaten Matthysse prior to his title win. Compare that to the one vs Garcia, where he was a contender.
The other guy McCloskey was a tune up fight and at the time was an undefeated prospect. Not Khan's fault how he turned out. That's like not giving Cotto credit for beating Corley because of what he has now turned out to be. Wins and Losses should be looked at what they meant.Last edited by Box-Office; 05-02-2014, 04:37 PM.Comment
Comment