Comments Thread For: Robert Garcia Amazed at The Longevity of Mayweather

[Pacquiao'd]

Floyd fought Oscar way before Manny. Floyd fought Hatton way before Manny. Floyd fought Shane way before Manny. Floyd fought Guerrero, and Freddie wanted Guerrero before Bradley II was made. Arum also wanted Cotto II, but he wanted a CW of 150 for 154 fighter, and Cotto refused. That's when Floyd fought Cotto at 154. You may call Floyd a Cherry-Picker, but Manny loves them cherries too.

Don't forget Floyd toyed with a younger Marquez whilst an older Marquez went on to ko PAC and PAC wanted cotto 2 but not at cottos requested weight.

[Nomadic]

After this clinic, your going to be glad you didn't get in the ring with him.

[SugaROIDS]

What is the meaning of "Floyd Fought his opponents a Way before Pacquiao?" A year before? LOL!!!!, Tito Fought all his opponents a way Before De la Hoya too. is not beat a guy by decision like Mayweather did, is the way pacquiao beat them.

[Bronx2245]

What is the meaning of "Floyd Fought his opponents a Way before Pacquiao?" A year before? LOL!!!!, Tito Fought all his opponents a way Before De la Hoya too. is not beat a guy by decision like Mayweather did, is the way pacquiao beat them.

I was making fun of the guy stating Pacquiao beat so and so way before Floyd. You're right,"how" is sometimes most telling. So compare "how" Floyd beat Marquez, and "how" Marquez always gives Manny nightmares. Floyd doesn't fight many people coming of a losses either. Manny's strategy is to beat Floyd's opponents. Freddie Roach said so. Floyd's strategy is to pick the best opponent that will make him money. It might be Canelo, Cotto, or Khan, but he's looking for MEGA-FIGHTS. He's been in 3 of the top 10 in boxing history, that's why he's so rich. Manny should be doing the same, not Marquez 5, Bradley III.

[MRCHOKEaMF]

I think he would have beat the daylights out of Pacquiao, but I knew what I was doing by avoiding those types of fights for Pacquiao".- Murad Mohammed (Pacquiao's promoter B4 ARum)

[megadeth]

"I think a fight against Floyd, I mean, we're going in against the best in the world," Garcia said. "We're going against the best in history."

Wow that's a couple of huge ridiculous statements. Mayweather never wanted to fight Pacquiao, so he never proved to be the best in the world, ever. Also he lost to Castillo in the first fight, so he is not really undefeated.

In the fight with JMM, he easily won the fight outside the ring with trickery, by making JMM go up two weight divisions in a short time period and then, on top of that, having the gall to come to the weigh-in a couple of pounds over the agreed weight and just paying a ridiculously small fine to get away with it. Who knows what would have happened with a healthy JMM in his natural weight division at that time, which was lightweight, both of them coming in at the weigh-in without extra weight.

And "the best in history" statement is just utterly ridiculous. Honestly, it sounds like a fix already, where the trainer of the predetermined loser is praising the default winner in a ridiculously exaggerated way before the fight, so when the fix already happens, the sell-out loser's trainer will say "well 'we' lost to the best ever, so there's nothing to be ashamed off". Pathetic.

I just can't get past how different Canelo looked vs. Mayweather than against everybody else (slow, clumsy, power-less, totally confused). And then, he fights Angulo and it happens exactly the opposite (Angulo is the one looking slow, clumsy, power-less, totally confused vs. Canelo and Canelo looks surprisingly great, right after looking so pathetic vs. Mayweather). Bottom line, both #1 and #2 Golden Boy's cash cows look "great" when it is just convenient for the business. Real su****ious...

Yeah ummm, that didn't happen. Why are u lying?

[handsome1-1]

Garcia hahaha u never looked at as one of the best.. Morales and Barrera were the top guys that time and yes PAC fought the only best not some nobody like you hahahaha