Who would rank superior in this WW triangle?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Jloro
    Invicta
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Dec 2012
    • 6930
    • 258
    • 811
    • 15,033

    #11
    I don't think any of them would easily beat the others

    Comment

    • InvalidUserID
      Contender
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • Oct 2011
      • 396
      • 25
      • 0
      • 8,544

      #12
      Porter/Bradley would be a brutal fight.

      I actually think Thurman could stop Bradley via ref stoppage.

      Comment

      • BuckToothed
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jan 2010
        • 2715
        • 300
        • 139
        • 22,872

        #13
        Everyone that is picking Thurman or Porter over Bradley just started watching boxing this month, hilarious...

        Comment

        • IIG
          Woo Pig Sooie!
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Oct 2008
          • 4917
          • 111
          • 341
          • 35,275

          #14
          Originally posted by Jack Napier
          1 Bradley
          2 Thurman
          3 Porter
          I agree with this.

          Comment

          • soul_survivor
            LOL @ Ali-Holmes
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Jun 2013
            • 18949
            • 623
            • 473
            • 65,236

            #15
            Originally posted by Foreign Soil
            Bradley, though he seems to be on the fade.

            Thurman vs Porter is a match that has got to be made. Edge to Thurman but Porter would make it uncomfortable as hell.
            Why is Bradley on the fade? Cos he lost to Pacquiao?

            Bradley is the 3rd best welterweight on the planet, he deserves to be spoken about in the same sentence as Floyd, Pac and possibly JMM.

            Everyone else and that includes Porter, Thurman, Maidana, Alexander, Khan, Collazo and who ever else are leagues below how good those 3 are.

            Thurman might have the best chance of the 3 to reach the top but that's still some years away.

            Comment

            • Wenpire
              Banned
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Sep 2013
              • 386
              • 45
              • 61
              • 538

              #16
              Bradley's resume makes Thurman and Porter look like a joke. Bradley has dominated guys like an undefeated Devon Alexander, Kendal Holt, prime Junior Witter, miguel Vazquez, undefeated Lamont Peterson, undefeated Luis Abregu, Ruslan Provodnikov, and stopped Casamayor when Guerrero couldn't. Neither Thurman or Porter has beaten anyone comparable to anybody on that list.

              Bradley is the 3rd best welterweight on the planet behind floyd and PAC and will remain that way till he loses to someone other than PAC.

              Comment

              • therealpugilist
                Undisputed Champion
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • May 2012
                • 14612
                • 561
                • 4
                • 45,735

                #17
                All those fighters.were at 140....bradley has not done much at.147....got a gift vs pac and a loss, beat 1 ww win jmm, barely beat provodnikov who as was not ranked at ww...thurman kos bradley and porter should be betting fav

                If you are no a slick guy and have no punch you will be in deep **** at ww...maidana beats him imo, pac, money, if he was GBP he would have a loss already at ww

                Comment

                • Foreign Soil
                  First Time Skeptic
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Jul 2013
                  • 5249
                  • 194
                  • 219
                  • 11,783

                  #18
                  Originally posted by soul_survivor
                  Why is Bradley on the fade? Cos he lost to Pacquiao?

                  Bradley is the 3rd best welterweight on the planet, he deserves to be spoken about in the same sentence as Floyd, Pac and possibly JMM.

                  Everyone else and that includes Porter, Thurman, Maidana, Alexander, Khan, Collazo and who ever else are leagues below how good those 3 are.

                  Thurman might have the best chance of the 3 to reach the top but that's still some years away.
                  Not because he lost but the way that he lost - he "won" the first Pac fight due to stamina, in the rematch he didn't have half the stamina. He beat Marquez, but it was a style matchup that he should've dominated more easily than what he did. Obviously Bradley's still a good fighter, but he's starting to fade.

                  Comment

                  • BUNGALOWS
                    undisputed champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Apr 2013
                    • 6331
                    • 326
                    • 154
                    • 7,018

                    #19
                    1. Bradley
                    2. I'm starting to think Thurman is better than Porter, and will beat him.
                    3. Porter.

                    Comment

                    • Ryn0
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Feb 2007
                      • 11139
                      • 310
                      • 269
                      • 20,767

                      #20
                      Bradley has the best resume, has beat the better fighters and is more experienced. You have to go with him until Porter or Thurman start doing what Bradley has done over the similar period of time

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP