Belts give fighters excuses to avoid the champion. Its the very reason why there is ducking. One guy in every division should hold every belt. If Wlad drops a belt, the top heavyweights will go into a rat race trying to capture it so they can call themselves "World Champions". Look at what happened to the WBC belt when Vitali dropped it.
So in Wlad's case, belts are very important or else the top fighters would duck him and go after the easier "title holders".
You think belts are important to Rigondeaux, Moreno, Golovkin, Miguez Vazquez, Richar Abril, Peter Quillin, Andre Ward and Kovelev? Hell yeah they are. They would be ducked like the plaque if they didn't have them. Some of them hold belts and are still ducked because they have weaker champions in their divisions that offer less risky title shots.
"Belts don't mean ****" is a cool thing to say but it doesn't apply in every case. The best position to be in is a unified champion because it increases your chances of getting the big fights.
So in Wlad's case, belts are very important or else the top fighters would duck him and go after the easier "title holders".
You think belts are important to Rigondeaux, Moreno, Golovkin, Miguez Vazquez, Richar Abril, Peter Quillin, Andre Ward and Kovelev? Hell yeah they are. They would be ducked like the plaque if they didn't have them. Some of them hold belts and are still ducked because they have weaker champions in their divisions that offer less risky title shots.
"Belts don't mean ****" is a cool thing to say but it doesn't apply in every case. The best position to be in is a unified champion because it increases your chances of getting the big fights.
Comment