Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Hopkins, Schaefer Respond to Shumenov Scoring

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by rasdun View Post
    I agree that scorin that for shumenov is terrible. But 116-111 was very fair. It ciukdve been wider but i gave 1, 2 and eithr 9 or 10 cant remembr which to shumenov and 3 and 4 were bhop but relatively clise i thought
    I can see first 3-4 to shumenov. The pronlem is no accountability. Its a joke that the same judge that scored the first fight for Bradley between Pacquiao and Bradley was then given the Mayweather vs Canelo fight, and scored that a draw. The judge of never gotten that assignment to begin with after the horrible just judging display and Pacquiao vs Bradley one

    Comment


    • #12
      3 rounds was the absolute max, if you're being generous, that Shumenov won. I don't think the 116-111 cards are good either, they're just being overshadowed by however the hell this guy scored the fight for Shumenov.

      Comment


      • #13
        Honestly, I gave Shumenov rounds 1 and 2 (although round 1 was almost even) and I gave all the other 10 rounds to Hopkins.

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by BennyST View Post
          Explain how you have Beibut winning those rounds, when he did much, much less then?

          If you 'go by the book' Hopkins couldn't have lost those rounds except the first. He landed more punches, he landed the cleaner punches, he controlled the pace, he controlled the space and made Shumenov do what he wanted and he hardly got touched by anything that Shumenov threw.

          That is scoring by the book.
          Popkins hardly threw anything early. Especially in rd 1.

          Comment


          • #15
            After round 2 i see no way Hopkins lost a round

            Comment


            • #16
              Bull****? Don't think so. Lots of ******** interests taking care of this stuff behind the scenes. These "bad decisions" are hardly anomalous.

              Comment


              • #17
                The first 2 could of went to Shumenov.

                After that I can't find any rounds that could possibly go that way. Even the 116-111 cards were bull**** to me.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by A-Wolf View Post
                  Bull****? Don't think so. Lots of ******** interests taking care of this stuff behind the scenes. These "bad decisions" are hardly anomalous.
                  Nobody bet any money on poor ol'Shumy so it's a lot easier to pay off 1 judge then scores of beters.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X
                  TOP