Originally posted by Berry Picker
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Floyd is clearly on PEDs.
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by -MARKAVELLI- View PostYou mean USADA, the one Floyd choice of testing keep the result under the rug!!!
That's interesting... go on....:LOL:
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jcpryor View PostWho would you say has been tested more since 09 - Floyd or Manny? Which one of these two people have had issues in the past submitting to drug testing, and which one voluntarily asked for it?
Floyd on the other hand could take any ****tail of powerful illegal PEDs on his vacations and they could clear his system in 9 months.
It it no coincidence that Floyd changed most dramatically during his two long vacations from any testing what so ever.
Comment
-
I am a man of science and like to stick to facts and observations to build my view on things. Now I do not believe Floyd is/was taking anything illegal in the sport of boxing... that doesn't of course mean he isn't, it just means with the available facts and observations to be made, nothing indicates he is using.
Floyd has been doing 'random' testing for 5 fights (6 soon) and has yet to fail a drugs test (both from USADA and NSAC).
People may argue these tests are not truly random as they are only when training for a fight however this argument only holds weight if we assume that Floyd is then taking PEDs when he is not training for a fight so he is not caught by the tests. This means he must be training his hardest when he is not training for a fight (in order to benefit from them) and cycling off them when he is training for a fight (this to me sounds incredibly inefficient as he would only get training benefits from the PEDs months before fight night). Now all we have to do is look at the evidence of his physique when he hasn't been training for a fight to see that he is clearly in better shape after a training camp than he is before/during (look at his physique in the Guerrero/Canelo/Maidana green screen filming before the fight and he doesn't look in super condition compared to how he looks on fight night/weigh in). So why take PEDs before a training camp and not get into peak condition using them? It all seems rather pointless taking them in the first place. Other people seem to argue that he cycles off PEDs during his off time (in between fights), which would mean he takes PEDs when in training camp (which makes the most sense as this would give him the most benefits) but this (with the available evidence) is untrue due to him passing all random tests within camp. So whichever way round you wish to say he is cycling off and using.... neither argument seems to hold up with the available evidence.
In conclusion, there doesn't seem to be enough incriminating evidence to say that he is a PED user, so be su****ious if you please.... but don't pretend you are being reasonable in your assertions.
Side note.... anyone mentioning Lance Armstrong.... you are aware the people who filed a suit and caught Armstrong after building up a solid case for years that forced him into admitting he was using was USADA? The same guys who test Floyd.
Comment
-
Originally posted by D4thincarnation View PostBecause Pacquiao has been continously fighting, where he's been under constant testing, where if he took some powerful illegal PEDs they would show up in a NSAC anti-doping test.
Floyd on the other hand could take any ****tail of powerful illegal PEDs on his vacations and they could clear his system in 9 months.
It it no coincidence that Floyd changed most dramatically during his two long vacations from any testing what so ever.
Comment
-
on the case of TRT lamont peterson never tested positive while using USADA because he uses it at a small dosage but when VADA was called in for his fight he tested dirty ...
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jcpryor View Postso you arent going to answer the question? I'm talking about blood tests.
The fact is Floyd could have taken the most powerful illegal PEDs and not have it show up in his tests.
Pacquiao couldn't.
Your points are irrelevant.
Comment
Comment