Pacquiao Bradley II Judge; 118-110???

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Rome-By-Ko
    The winner Is
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Mar 2009
    • 20157
    • 323
    • 332
    • 29,833

    #31
    Originally posted by - Righteous -
    Apparently Bradley fans are blind. Bradley got his ass beat, what the hell fight were you watching?
    I don't agree,just like I don't agree about the first fight..I thought Bradley lost this one..If you really believe Bradley did not/could not win 4 or 5 rds,then I don't know what fight you were watching..Truthfully..

    Comment

    • sugarsmosley
      sugarsmosley
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Apr 2013
      • 7393
      • 467
      • 436
      • 14,323

      #32
      Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko
      I don't agree,just like I don't agree about the first fight..I thought Bradley lost this one..If you really believe Bradley did not/could not win 4 or 5 rds,then I don't know what fight you were watching..Truthfully..
      atleast you admit he lost, a true stormtrooper right here who tells it like it is, props bro!

      Comment

      • DARKSEID
        Banned
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Jan 2010
        • 17578
        • 962
        • 512
        • 43,940

        #33
        Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko
        I don't agree,just like I don't agree about the first fight..I thought Bradley lost this one..If you really believe Bradley did not/could not win 4 or 5 rds,then I don't know what fight you were watching..Truthfully..
        My bad I thought you said Bradley won by 4 or 5 rounds.

        I'm rewatching the fight right now and so far I got it 2-2.

        Pacquiao was ****ing Bradley up in round 2 and 3.

        Comment

        • Rome-By-Ko
          The winner Is
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Mar 2009
          • 20157
          • 323
          • 332
          • 29,833

          #34
          Originally posted by sugarsmosley
          atleast you admit he lost, a true stormtrooper right here who tells it like it is, props bro!
          I have no issue with saying Bradley loss..That's why I never understood why so many thought I was doing that for the first fight..I thought the first fight was much harder to score..A lot of rds were close,this fight was a bit more clear cut..I scored it 8-4 Pac..Even tho rd 5 was close,but I scored it a draw..Rd 11 was a Bradley rd,and how I thought he should have fought this fight..Yet again his ego got in the way,but this time it coast him imo..

          It was a great night,fun card..I don't understand the people talking about the undercard..It's not always going to be Garcia vs Matt's,on every undercard..I thought the undercard was evenly match and really good fights..

          Comment

          • Rome-By-Ko
            The winner Is
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Mar 2009
            • 20157
            • 323
            • 332
            • 29,833

            #35
            Originally posted by - Righteous -
            My bad I thought you said Bradley won by 4 or 5 rounds.

            I'm rewatching the fight right now and so far I got it 2-2.

            Pacquiao was ****ing Bradley up in round 2 and 3.
            Nah I thought Pac clearly won..Is it me or did Bradley start fighting differently after he was pushed into the ropes..Your watching the fight right now,just curious??

            I don't know if Pac was ever really fuccking Bradley up..I mean he not at one point looked like Cotto or Hatton or someone of the nature,which is what I consider a person being fuccked up by Pac looks like..I felt it was a competitive fight that Pac took over/Bradley let get away from him..If Bradley was being fuccked up I don't think it would have been as entertaining as it was..

            Comment

            • Fangedgrowl
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Mar 2014
              • 2111
              • 126
              • 0
              • 27,903

              #36
              He sure didget that ass beat. Bradley didn't win 4 rounds. don't know what fight you all were watching. Bradley is lucky to have the scores 116-112. Should have been 117-111

              Comment

              • bopbopbbe
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Mar 2012
                • 1369
                • 56
                • 4
                • 10,071

                #37
                The only reasonable scores have it being an even fight up til the 6th then after that Bradley won two rounds AT MOST. But i agree that a 10-2 pacquiao score is a bit wide.

                Comment

                • Ringlife
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Jun 2011
                  • 5861
                  • 64
                  • 49
                  • 12,524

                  #38
                  Fighters should be aware of this judge and not let him judge their fights. He needs to be suspended without pay this s**t is ridiculous.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  TOP