Tweet
....time. And Bradley had improved, markedly too. I know you might say "oh well he beat him last time so its the same thing"..well no he didnt. That fight was a lot closer and Pacquaio wasnt winning all the rounds. This time left no doubt against a markedly improved Bradley and everyone is saying hes worse?? I dont get it. If he looked a hair slower it was traded in for more smartness in the ring. He is still perfectly capable of beating Floyd tell your man TO STOP DUCKING HIM Floydnuthuggers.
-
-
TRUE! But in the first dight you could see Pac was still fast and could land sone power to move Bradley , he was just easy going.
But in 2nd fight, u can see he was slower, no pop on his punches and getting tagged with shots he didnt get hit with ib the 1st. Its weird cuz gr beat an eveb better bradley but didnt look as good as the 1st -
In the 1st fight pacquiao missed alot of his "landed" shots, lampley would literally go bonkers when a punch clearly missed.Comment
-
He fought more cautious this time and got hit flush more times and even hurt by Bradley who people call pillow fisted,that is a bad sign,and also he was missing a lot of punches in this fight clearly, he looked slower and showed less power...yes he won but it was not impressive to me at allComment
-
Nobody is going to look good against a Bradley that is fighting smart. He went to war with Provo because he had zero respect for the Russian. This Bradley will be very difficult to beat from now on.Last edited by jqSide; 04-14-2014, 02:10 PM.Comment
Comment